Teams

Hit and Run

2026 ITA - WY Mixed · 7.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-19vs Wyoming/Ellbogan/ITAMixed7.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Plowman / Emily McRady vs Robert Litke / Stacia Vigneri6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJosh Cossitt / Katherine Plowman vs Tom Ellbogen / TimAnn Day6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCharles Oneill / Kristy Hammond vs John Yost / Kim Byrd2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-07-18vs Wyoming/Ellbogan/ITAMixed7.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKatherine Plowman / Daniel Plowman vs Jacob Pierce / TimAnn Day2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJosh Cossitt / Emily McRady vs Robert Litke / Mary Ridgeway2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Oneill / Kristy Hammond vs John Yost / Stacia Vigneri2-6, 0-1
2026-07-18vs Wyoming/Ellbogan/ITAMixed7.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCharles Oneill / Emily McRady vs Jacob Pierce / Mary Ridgeway4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJosh Cossitt / Katherine Plowman vs Robert Litke / Kim Byrd7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrandon DeJongh / Kristy Hammond vs Tom Ellbogen / Stacia Vigneri4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Josh Cossitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Daniel Plowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Charles Oneill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.26
Emily McRady
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Brandon DeJongh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Katherine Plowman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kristy Hammond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Plowman + Katherine Plowman2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Josh Cossitt
9W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Daniel Plowman
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Charles Oneill
0W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Emily McRady
6W–7L career · type T · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Brandon DeJongh
2W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Katherine Plowman
35W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
Kristy Hammond
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.