Teams

Jack Coleman/Smith W4.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-10vs Oak Creek/Timothy W4.5FWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Turck / Pare Radillo-Underwood vs Natalie Timothy / Bonnie Masten7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulia Su / Terri Paterson vs Kristen Aragon / Meghan Lambert6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Northington / Terri Paterson vs Melanie Finnegan / Celesta Caldwell3-6, 2-6
2025-09-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Turck / Pare Radillo-Underwood vs Elise Jeffery / Delynn Davidson6-2, 6-4
2025-09-12vs The Lakes TA/Hunt-Wollitz W4.5FLost 01
L#1 DoublesTiffini Williams / Annette Wilson vs Kaitlin Lovern / Mary Allen6-0, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lifetime Plano/Behrman-Hanold W4.5F6019511145
2Wagon Wheel/Urano W4.5F5118617189
3Jack Coleman/Smith W4.5F42131124200
4DAC/Wheeler W4.5F33101429232
5The Lakes TA/Hunt-Wollitz W4.5F2491533232
6Oak Creek/Timothy W4.5F1581636249
7Samuell Grand/Jeffery-Musick W4.5F0671736251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Alexandra Turck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
Alyssa Bauer
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.28
Meghann Strickland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Annette Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Emily Lu
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
4.22
Alexandra Northington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.15
Rachel Pungwe
published 4.5
4.03
Julia Su
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Jill Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.99
Ryoko Suzuki
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.94
Tiffini Williams
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Heather Turck
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Pare Radillo-Underwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Gunn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Terri Paterson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Turck + Alexandra Turck5258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexandra Turck
26W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
4.36
4.5
Alyssa Bauer
31W–22L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
4.35
Meghann Strickland
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Annette Wilson
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Emily Lu
19W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Alexandra Northington
15W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Rachel Pungwe
9W–15L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
Julia Su
22W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Jill Montgomery
17W–20L career · 12 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
Ryoko Suzuki
23W–37L career · 7 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.99
Tiffini Williams
17W–37L career · 8 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94
Heather Turck
13W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pare Radillo-Underwood
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Gunn
4W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terri Paterson
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.