Teams

Lifetime Plano/Behrman-Hanold W4.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

19 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-17vs Wagon Wheel/Urano W4.5FWon 10
W#1 DoublesSonia Moorthy / Melanie Finnegan vs Kate VandeBerghe / Kenda Bevill6-1, 6-4
2025-10-10vs DAC/Wheeler W4.5FLost 01
L#3 DoublesKristal Roberts / Amy Ostella vs Kayo Rohovsky / HIROE BLACKLEDGE4-6, 3-6
2025-10-03vs Oak Creek/Timothy W4.5FSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Ostella / Kristal Roberts vs Nicole Hanson / Jessica Celentano6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Heinrich vs Thea Junt6-3, 6-0
2025-09-26vs Jack Coleman/Smith W4.5FWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelanie Finnegan / Celesta Caldwell vs Alexandra Northington / Terri Paterson6-3, 6-2
2025-09-12Won 20
W#1 SinglesEri Matsumoto vs Elise Jeffery6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Ostella / Kristal Roberts vs Delynn Davidson / Holly Simmons6-3, 6-3
2025-09-05Won 20
W#1 DoublesAllison Parks / Carolyn Heinrich vs Sarah Wollitz / Christie Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEri Matsumoto / Celesta Caldwell vs Melissa Holden / Sanella Wertz6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lifetime Plano/Behrman-Hanold W4.5F6019511145
2Wagon Wheel/Urano W4.5F5118617189
3Jack Coleman/Smith W4.5F42131124200
4DAC/Wheeler W4.5F33101429232
5The Lakes TA/Hunt-Wollitz W4.5F2491533232
6Oak Creek/Timothy W4.5F1581636249
7Samuell Grand/Jeffery-Musick W4.5F0671736251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Christy Vutam
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.41
Celesta Caldwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.41
Luisa Osorio
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
4.38
Melanie Finnegan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.38
Allison Parks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.35
Eri Matsumoto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.31
Sonia Moorthy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.29
Marian Bednar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.28
Keasha Behrman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.24
Anne Perez
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.20
Sandy Mora
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Teri Ware
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.11
Maki Berman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.10
Carolyn Heinrich
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.05
Kristal Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Melissa Hanold
published
3.78
Amy Ostella
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Hayley Herman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Rachel Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonia Moorthy + Melanie Finnegan7560% games+10.5% vs expected
Sandy Mora + Maki Berman4266% gamesnot enough data
Amy Ostella + Kristal Roberts3350% gamesnot enough data
Celesta Caldwell + Anne Perez4161% gamesnot enough data
Allison Parks + Luisa Osorio5076% gamesnot enough data
Celesta Caldwell + Melanie Finnegan314 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Stokes + Luisa Osorio404 matchesnot enough data
Sonia Moorthy + Anne Perez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christy Vutam
31W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Celesta Caldwell
31W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.41
Luisa Osorio
35W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
4.41
Melanie Finnegan
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
4.38
5
Allison Parks
19W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.38
Eri Matsumoto
25W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
Sonia Moorthy
34W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Marian Bednar
23W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
Keasha Behrman
33W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Anne Perez
25W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24
Sandy Mora
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Teri Ware
22W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
Maki Berman
26W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Carolyn Heinrich
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
4.10
Kristal Roberts
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.05
Melissa Hanold
1W–12L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.03
4
Amy Ostella
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Hayley Herman
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Stokes
11W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.