Teams

KC-CC RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-03vs GR REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Madison / Kim Sandman vs Andrea Godber / Ashley Busch7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-26vs LEBTC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesCari Eversman / Amanda Mueller vs Kellie Naclerio / Blair Weber3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKim Sandman / Allison Rooney vs Dorothy Carr / Erica Giesen6-7, 4-6
2024-08-19vs SS-LGT ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesCari Eversman / Amanda Mueller vs Gabriela Cerny / Jenni Poulos2-6, 3-6
2024-08-12vs KC-CC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesCari Eversman / Amanda Mueller vs Annamaria Augustine / Lisa Killion7-5, 6-3
2024-08-10vs BCST GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesCari Eversman / Amanda Mueller vs Kimberly Lange / Mary Mucilli6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKim Sandman vs Meghan Ciacci6-3, 6-3
2024-07-29vs LEBTC ORANGEWon 10
W#1 SinglesCari Eversman vs Kristin Hull6-2, 6-1
2024-07-22vs CCC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesCari Eversman / Kim Sandman vs Leesa Blanding / Mikelle Smith2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Peggy Cooper
published
3.10
Amanda Mueller
published 3
3.01
Cari Eversman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.84
Allison Rooney
published 3
2.81
Julie Madison
published
2.79
Kim Sandman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Vicki Sullivan
published 3
Jennifer Schum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Cooper + Allison Rooney8065% games+7.9% vs expected
Vicki Sullivan + Cari Eversman5453% gamesnot enough data
Kim Sandman + Vicki Sullivan3245% gamesnot enough data
Kim Sandman + Cari Eversman314 matchesnot enough data
Kim Sandman + Allison Rooney224 matchesnot enough data
Vicki Sullivan + Jennifer Schum134 matchesnot enough data
Peggy Cooper + Cari Eversman213 matchesnot enough data
Cari Eversman + Allison Rooney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peggy Cooper
34W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3
Amanda Mueller
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Cari Eversman
96W–57L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Allison Rooney
22W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Julie Madison
20W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Kim Sandman
34W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Vicki Sullivan
63W–70L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
2.76
Jennifer Schum
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.