Teams

CCC BLUE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-04vs KC-CC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Wiley / Mikelle Smith vs Carla Minckley / Lisa Killion6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesOlivia Booysen vs Ellen Lee6-1, 6-0
2024-09-02vs BCST GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Cohen / Janette Wenger vs Kimberly Lange / Brett Gnadt6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Penza / Laura Good vs Maryann Barwick / Mary Mucilli7-5, 7-6
2024-08-26vs LEBTC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeesa Blanding / Olivia Booysen vs Kim Kronenberger Hogan / Renee Thouvenot6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNicolette Picerno / Katie Cohen vs Laurie Sinclair / Leanne Franke6-0, 6-2
2024-08-12vs LEBTC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Penza / Katie Cohen vs Stacie Sonius / Kellie Naclerio2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesOlivia Booysen vs Blair Weber6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJanette Wenger / Nicolette Picerno vs Kelly Callister / Erica Giesen2-6, 1-6
2024-08-12vs GR REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Penza / Lauren Healey vs EMILY JENNINGS / Abby Letourneau0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesNicolette Picerno / Janette Wenger vs Andrea Godber / Ashley Busch6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-29vs SS-LGT ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Wiley / Mikelle Smith vs Gabriela Cerny / Jenni Poulos1-4
2024-07-22vs KC-CC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeesa Blanding / Mikelle Smith vs Cari Eversman / Kim Sandman6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Olivia Booysen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Leesa Blanding
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Erin Wiley
published
3.26
Katie Cohen
published
3.22
Mikelle Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.76
Lauren Healey
published
2.68
Janette Wenger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Melissa Penza
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Stacey Hicks
published
2.58
Nicolette Picerno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Laura Good
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janette Wenger + Stacey Hicks1641% games−5.6% vs expected
Leesa Blanding + Olivia Booysen5453% gamesnot enough data
Janette Wenger + Mikelle Smith2448% gamesnot enough data
Janette Wenger + Nicolette Picerno2341% gamesnot enough data
Mikelle Smith + Leesa Blanding404 matchesnot enough data
Erin Wiley + Olivia Booysen404 matchesnot enough data
Janette Wenger + Melissa Penza123 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Penza + Leesa Blanding213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Olivia Booysen
93W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Leesa Blanding
90W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
Erin Wiley
25W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Katie Cohen
17W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Mikelle Smith
83W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Lauren Healey
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Janette Wenger
67W–84L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Melissa Penza
60W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
Stacey Hicks
7W–18L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Nicolette Picerno
29W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
Laura Good
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.