Teams

OK/Platvoet/40&over4.5W

2025 TUL ADULT 40 & Over WOMEN League · 4.5 WOMEN

19 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ashley Stone
published 4.5
Cheryl Hughes
published 4.5
4.09
Maresa Boshoff
published
4.09
Amanda Scroggs
published 4.5
4.08
Clarice Clash
published 4.5
3.99
3.99
Yolande Platvoet
published
3.97
Suzanne Peterson
published
3.94
Mandy Obana
published
3.94
De'Aun Sandvig
published 4.5
3.93
Janet Chambers
published
3.90
Catherine Mower
published 4.5
3.89
Julie Heil
published
3.83
Colleen Schulz
published 4.5
3.83
Emily Pomeroy
published
3.80
Lindsay Myers
published
3.79
Elissandra Bailey
published
3.60
Michele Hill
published
3.34
Sandra Leos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maresa Boshoff + Cheryl Hughes6166% games+14.9% vs expected
Jennifer Linn Howard + Amanda Scroggs13066% games+11.3% vs expected
Colleen Schulz + Cheryl Hughes6359% games+9.9% vs expected
Michele Hill + Emily Pomeroy7464% games+7.6% vs expected
Jennifer Linn Howard + Cheryl Hughes4166% games+5.7% vs expected
Mandy Obana + Julie Heil7261% games+4.3% vs expected
Jennifer Linn Howard + Elissandra Bailey2435% games−11.1% vs expected
Mandy Obana + Lindsay Myers2742% games−13.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Stone
56W–35L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cheryl Hughes
36W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maresa Boshoff
56W–19L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Amanda Scroggs
93W–40L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Clarice Clash
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
Jennifer Linn Howard
84W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
Yolande Platvoet
43W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Suzanne Peterson
50W–33L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Mandy Obana
49W–52L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.94
4.5
De'Aun Sandvig
32W–28L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
Janet Chambers
74W–54L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.93
4.5
Catherine Mower
30W–45L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
Julie Heil
59W–26L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.89
4.5
Colleen Schulz
51W–60L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.83
Emily Pomeroy
42W–55L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Lindsay Myers
68W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.80
Elissandra Bailey
36W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.79
Michele Hill
74W–49L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Sandra Leos
82W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.