Teams

Winner/Lake Kennedy - Riccio

2024 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 18 & Over Fall NONADV · 6.5 W Thursday EVE

14 players · average NTRP 3.21 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesGail Hawthorne / Laura Haney vs Angela Sterious / Candace Schecter6-3, 6-3
2024-11-07vs Babcock National - JichaLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Jodi Saxman vs Lori Bieniek / Heidi Balter1-6, 2-6
2024-10-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Marinell / Jodi Saxman vs Donna Douglass / Denise Vaccaro6-3, 7-5
2024-10-17vs Gulf Harbour - WonnenbergLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobin Riccio / Kelly Scott vs Amy Prenger / Jennifer Olson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCathrin Matzen / Alexandria Dahms vs Leah Esoer / Janet Jenkins3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJEANNIE THWAITES / Jodee Siriano vs Candace Kelly / Tasha Morris0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Thursday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Cheryl VandeVoorde
published 3.5
3.43
Robin Riccio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Amy Marinell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.35
Cathrin Matzen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Sue Savage
published
3.15
Terri Brown
published
2.91
Jodi Saxman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Beth Andrews
published 3
2.76
Alexandria Dahms
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gail Hawthorne
published 3
2.69
JEANNIE THWAITES
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jodee Siriano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodi Saxman + Laura Haney5643% gamesnot enough data
Sue Savage + Cathrin Matzen3251% gamesnot enough data
Gail Hawthorne + JEANNIE THWAITES123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl VandeVoorde
66W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
Robin Riccio
32W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Amy Marinell
96W–64L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Cathrin Matzen
24W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.35
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.30
Sue Savage
40W–28L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.25
Terri Brown
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jodi Saxman
28W–65L career · 2 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Beth Andrews
28W–36L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Alexandria Dahms
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Gail Hawthorne
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
JEANNIE THWAITES
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Jodee Siriano
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Scott
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.