Teams

NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40MX7.0A

2024 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#2 DoublesAndrew Bidou / Christy Roberts vs Gil Fuentes / Fely Anne Cuison3-6, 2-6
2024-06-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Bidou / Jacynthe Hamel vs Gina Chen / Ruben Ruiz2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Amanda DeBord
published 3.5
3.54
Andrew Bidou
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.52
Nancy Selph
published
3.49
Virginia Freeland
published
3.45
Daniel Satake
published 3.5
3.40
Christy Roberts
published 3.5
3.35
Jacynthe Hamel
published
3.26
Samanda Dorger
published
3.25
Aaron Starfire
published 3.5
3.22
Bryce Whitlock
published 3.5
3.21
Yukie Toyama
published
3.19
Magaly Otero
published
3.13
Ed Kohos
published 3.5
3.09
Lindsey Levine
published
3.04
Jessica Thornton
published
2.94
Kathleen Herrera
published
2.20
ALLISON WHITLOCK
published 2.5
Doug Fraggi
published
Eraj Siddiqui
published
Louis Torche
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Fraggi + Amanda DeBord123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda DeBord
28W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Andrew Bidou
106W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.54
Nancy Selph
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.52
Virginia Freeland
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Daniel Satake
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Christy Roberts
18W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jacynthe Hamel
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Samanda Dorger
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Aaron Starfire
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Bryce Whitlock
0W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Yukie Toyama
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.21
Magaly Otero
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Ed Kohos
5W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
Lindsey Levine
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Jessica Thornton
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
Kathleen Herrera
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
2.5
ALLISON WHITLOCK
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.20
Doug Fraggi
6W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Eraj Siddiqui
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Louis Torche
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.