Teams

NRRC: Nice Racquettes

2026 18&Over Women Day Winter · 2.5 Day

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesDanielle Klein / Adriana Souza vs Nina Krstic / Kate MacHan6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMeghan Davidson / Lynn Janson vs Prudence Fisher / Laura Rubin6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesValerie Ferrara / Lucia Speight vs Jordana Beck / Elly Roman6-2, 6-2
2026-03-03vs WCC: Serve-ivorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDanielle Klein / Kerry Tarr vs Lindsey Lee / Helen Woods6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlison Kranzley / Lynn Janson vs Lizzy Monaghan / Karina Verni3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeghan Davidson / Adriana Souza vs Erin Brooks / Jennifer Eylward6-1, 6-4
2026-01-09vs NRRC: Slice GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebra Albert / Valerie Ferrara vs Mia Jung-Smith / Jennifer Ham1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Meghan Davidson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Lynn Janson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Danielle Klein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Alison Kranzley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Colleen Fitzsimons
published 2.5
2.25
Kerry Tarr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Anne Wagstaff
published 2.5
2.15
Adriana Souza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.15
Debra Albert
published 2.5
2.10
Purvi Shah
published
2.09
Lucia Speight
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Valerie Ferrara
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Emilie Soto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Purvi Shah + Kerry Tarr8654% games+6.1% vs expected
Purvi Shah + Debra Albert0532% gamesnot enough data
Kerry Tarr + Anne Wagstaff123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meghan Davidson
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.53
Lynn Janson
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.40
2.5
Danielle Klein
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Alison Kranzley
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Colleen Fitzsimons
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kerry Tarr
19W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Anne Wagstaff
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Adriana Souza
22W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Debra Albert
12W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Purvi Shah
12W–30L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Lucia Speight
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Valerie Ferrara
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Emilie Soto
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.