Teams

Yonkers Tennis Center: Causing a Racket

2026 18&Over Women Day Winter · 2.5 Day

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesAnna Fontana / Noelle DelGiudice vs Catherine Murphy / Susan Benkelman6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPrudence Fisher / Laura Rubin vs Krista Friedrich / Lillian Ringel6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElly Roman / Kate MacHan vs Andrea Pucci / Barbara Fehrenbach6-1, 6-1
2026-03-16vs NRRC: Nice RacquettesLost 03
L#1 DoublesNina Krstic / Kate MacHan vs Danielle Klein / Adriana Souza2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPrudence Fisher / Laura Rubin vs Meghan Davidson / Lynn Janson0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJordana Beck / Elly Roman vs Valerie Ferrara / Lucia Speight2-6, 2-6
2026-02-11vs NRRC: Slice GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElly Roman / Amy Evans vs Jennifer Ham / Lindsay Druker2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Rubin / Alice Kung vs Mia Jung-Smith / Jennifer Riguardi6-4, 6-5
2026-01-05vs WCC: Serve-ivorsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlice Kung / Melissa Gamache vs Karina Verni / Helen Woods1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKate MacHan / Marybeth Sheppard vs Lizzy Monaghan / Victoria Tiburzi6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.46
Marybeth Sheppard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Noelle DelGiudice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Alice Kung
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.25
Anna Fontana
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.21
Prudence Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Kate MacHan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.06
Laura Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.86
Elly Roman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Gamache
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elly Roman + Anna Fontana1535% gamesnot enough data
Alice Kung + Prudence Fisher314 matchesnot enough data
Prudence Fisher + Elly Roman134 matchesnot enough data
Prudence Fisher + Anna Fontana314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marybeth Sheppard
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
Noelle DelGiudice
14W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Alice Kung
15W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Anna Fontana
12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Prudence Fisher
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Kate MacHan
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Laura Rubin
5W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Elly Roman
7W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Melissa Gamache
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.