Teams

BASALT GREY

2025 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-26vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Daniel / Colleen Barill vs Brooke Stott / Carrie Kellman7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Goldberg / Lynsey Pulliam vs Shauna de Moraes / Carolyn Strautman2-6, 5-7
2025-09-19vs BASALT BLACKLost 01
L#1 DoublesColleen Barill / Amy Daniel vs Shauna de Moraes / Carrie Kellman0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-07vs BASALT BLACKLost 01
L#1 DoublesTONI COURTENAY / Desiree Pimentel vs Richlyn Pavcek / Carrie Kellman2-6, 6-7
2025-08-29vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Daniel / Colleen Barill vs Shauna de Moraes / Carolyn Strautman6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Nancy Garrigus vs Anne Goldberg / Lynsey Pulliam0-6, 5-7
2025-08-22vs BASALT BLACKLost 01
L#1 DoublesTONI COURTENAY / Lynsey Pulliam vs Carrie Kellman / Brooke Stott1-6, 5-7
2025-08-15vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesColleen Barill / Lynsey Pulliam vs Carrie Kellman / Brooke Stott3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Nancy Garrigus vs TONI COURTENAY / Desiree Pimentel6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BASALT GREY2531122155

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Amy Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Anne Goldberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Colleen Barill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Lynsey Pulliam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Richlyn Pavcek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
TONI COURTENAY
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.11
Desiree Pimentel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Barill + Amy Daniel6261% games+3.5% vs expected
Richlyn Pavcek + Colleen Barill123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Daniel
30W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3
Anne Goldberg
21W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Colleen Barill
22W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Lynsey Pulliam
19W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Richlyn Pavcek
20W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
TONI COURTENAY
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Desiree Pimentel
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.