Teams

BASALT BLACK

2025 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-26vs BASALT GREYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrooke Stott / Carrie Kellman vs Amy Daniel / Colleen Barill6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShauna de Moraes / Carolyn Strautman vs Anne Goldberg / Lynsey Pulliam6-2, 7-5
2025-09-19vs BASALT GREYWon 10
W#1 DoublesShauna de Moraes / Carrie Kellman vs Colleen Barill / Amy Daniel6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-07vs BASALT GREYWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Carrie Kellman vs TONI COURTENAY / Desiree Pimentel6-2, 7-6
2025-08-29vs BASALT GREYLost 02
L#1 DoublesShauna de Moraes / Carolyn Strautman vs Amy Daniel / Colleen Barill2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Nancy Garrigus vs Anne Goldberg / Lynsey Pulliam0-6, 5-7
2025-08-22vs BASALT GREYWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Kellman / Brooke Stott vs TONI COURTENAY / Lynsey Pulliam6-1, 7-5
2025-08-15vs BASALT GREYWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarrie Kellman / Brooke Stott vs Colleen Barill / Lynsey Pulliam6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Nancy Garrigus vs TONI COURTENAY / Desiree Pimentel6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Shauna de Moraes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Brooke Stott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Carrie Kellman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Carolyn Strautman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Richlyn Pavcek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Nancy Garrigus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Strautman + Shauna de Moraes10358% games+7.0% vs expected
Brooke Stott + Carrie Kellman7554% games+5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shauna de Moraes
23W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Brooke Stott
35W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Carrie Kellman
20W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Carolyn Strautman
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Richlyn Pavcek
20W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Nancy Garrigus
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%62%38%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.