Teams

GR RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.31 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs KC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Fenny Evers vs Janet Weyhmiller / Julia McCoy4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJodie Wang vs Julie Hobart3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Killion / Michelle Windemuller vs Briana Epp / Nancy Crease1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Merritt / Leann Koontz vs Kathleen Schuster / Christie Hughes1-6, 1-6
2022-07-14vs KC BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesMichelle Windemuller / Ana Cruz vs Karen Logsdon / Sara VanHook7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesFenny Evers vs Susan Bratschun5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeann Koontz / Jodie Wang vs Sharon Seemann / Jami Jensen4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLynn Hoppe / Lisa Killion vs Lynne Jansons / Kit Fitzgerald4-6, 2-6
2022-07-07vs PH NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesAna Cruz / Michelle Windemuller vs Amy Gautreau / Kim Byers4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJodie Wang vs Angela Miller2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Hoppe / Leann Koontz vs Monica Morton / Karissa Savage4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSue Carmody / Lisa Killion vs Darci Cruickshank / Alison Dosher6-4, 6-2
2022-06-30vs NJ GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Windemuller / Lynn Hoppe vs Susan Bolton / Jennifer Grube2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Vicki Kern vs Rebecca Strobel / Rachel Price3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJodie Wang / Leann Koontz vs Terri Jenney / Lisa Mountain4-6, 2-6
2022-06-23vs LEBTC ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesAna Cruz / Michelle Windemuller vs Jane Braaten / Marcy Butler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Julie Merritt vs Stephanie Lanziner / Kelley Treichel3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesVicki Kern / Lynn Hoppe vs Kim Belitz / Emily Dreyer6-4, 6-4
2022-06-16vs KC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesAna Cruz / Michelle Windemuller vs Alyssa Elmore / Nancy Crease3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Kern / Sue Carmody vs Kathleen Schuster / Sarah Bryan4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Jodie Wang vs Cari Eversman / Christie Hughes0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-06-09vs KC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Michelle Windemuller vs Karen Logsdon / Joelle Arne1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJodie Wang vs Mary Ann Cabot6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLeann Koontz / Ana Cruz vs Sandy Courtney / Jami Jensen6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Killion / Lynn Hoppe vs Lynne Jansons / Kit Fitzgerald5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Jodie Wang
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Fenny Evers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.22
Sue Carmody
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Vicki Kern
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Ana Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.79
Lisa Killion
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Michelle Windemuller
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.69
Philippa Biggi
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.59
Leann Koontz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Julie Merritt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lynn Hoppe
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philippa Biggi + Leann Koontz41142% games+4.3% vs expected
Fenny Evers + Michelle Windemuller5449% games+3.7% vs expected
Lynn Hoppe + Leann Koontz1644% games+1.6% vs expected
Philippa Biggi + Lisa Killion1432% games+0.1% vs expected
Ana Cruz + Michelle Windemuller6843% games−0.1% vs expected
Philippa Biggi + Michelle Windemuller2437% games−4.6% vs expected
Vicki Kern + Sue Carmody2543% games−9.3% vs expected
Vicki Kern + Michelle Windemuller1537% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jodie Wang
40W–30L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%9%91%
3.68
4
Fenny Evers
46W–43L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Sue Carmody
22W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Vicki Kern
19W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Ana Cruz
17W–33L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Lisa Killion
20W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Michelle Windemuller
42W–73L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Philippa Biggi
62W–106L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Leann Koontz
54W–100L career · 5 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
2.59
Julie Merritt
24W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Hoppe
13W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.