Teams

KC BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs LEBTC ORANGEWon 40
W#1 DoublesHeidi Griffiths / Karen Logsdon vs Anne Fanganello / Kelley Treichel6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSusan Bratschun vs Emily Dreyer6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSandy Courtney / Jami Jensen vs Jane Braaten / Marcy Butler6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Seemann / Kit Fitzgerald vs Stephanie Lanziner / Linsay Shirley6-0, 6-1
2022-07-14vs GR REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesKaren Logsdon / Sara VanHook vs Michelle Windemuller / Ana Cruz5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSusan Bratschun vs Fenny Evers7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSharon Seemann / Jami Jensen vs Leann Koontz / Jodie Wang6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLynne Jansons / Kit Fitzgerald vs Lynn Hoppe / Lisa Killion6-4, 6-2
2022-07-07vs NJ GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesSara VanHook / Joelle Arne vs Susan Bolton / Jennifer Grube4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSusan Bratschun vs Michelle Halliday4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesHeidi Griffiths / Kit Fitzgerald vs Amanda Wintenburg / Irina Schwarzburg4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJami Jensen / Mary Ann Cabot vs Becky Bell / Rachel Price3-6, 0-6
2022-06-30vs KC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesSara VanHook / Joelle Arne vs Christie Weber / Nancy Crease7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSusan Bratschun vs Sarah Bryan6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Logsdon / Heidi Griffiths vs Kathleen Schuster / Julia McCoy6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSharon Seemann / Kit Fitzgerald vs Julie Hobart / Christie Hughes6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-23vs PH NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesHeidi Griffiths / Sara VanHook vs Kristin Overton / Karissa Savage6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesSharon Seemann vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJami Jensen / Sandy Courtney vs Julie Picha / Angela Miller3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Bratschun / Lynne Jansons vs Kim Byers / Jameela Khadiwala2-6, 4-6
2022-06-16vs LEBTC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara VanHook / Joelle Arne vs Jane Braaten / Anne Fanganello6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Logsdon / Jenny Tenney vs Kelley Treichel / Marcy Butler6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSandy Courtney / Susan Bratschun vs Emily Dreyer / Kim Belitz3-6, 6-7
2022-06-09vs GR REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKaren Logsdon / Joelle Arne vs Philippa Biggi / Michelle Windemuller6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMary Ann Cabot vs Jodie Wang1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Courtney / Jami Jensen vs Leann Koontz / Ana Cruz3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLynne Jansons / Kit Fitzgerald vs Lisa Killion / Lynn Hoppe7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Karen Logsdon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.44
Joelle Arne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Sharon Seemann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Sara VanHook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Mary Ann Cabot
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.11
Sandy Courtney
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Heidi Griffiths
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Jami Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.97
Susan Bratschun
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Kit Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.74
Lynne Jansons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jenny Tenney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leigh Mattson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Courtney + Sharon Seemann3358% games+13.1% vs expected
Karen Logsdon + Sharon Seemann6354% games+10.0% vs expected
Kit Fitzgerald + Sharon Seemann5449% games+6.2% vs expected
Sara VanHook + Sandy Courtney7258% games+4.5% vs expected
Heidi Griffiths + Karen Logsdon6654% games+4.0% vs expected
Sara VanHook + Joelle Arne412455% games+2.8% vs expected
Sandy Courtney + Heidi Griffiths6550% games+2.5% vs expected
Sara VanHook + Jami Jensen9852% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Logsdon
67W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Joelle Arne
64W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Sharon Seemann
52W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Sara VanHook
74W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Mary Ann Cabot
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Sandy Courtney
71W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Heidi Griffiths
50W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Jami Jensen
42W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
Susan Bratschun
42W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Kit Fitzgerald
28W–53L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Lynne Jansons
33W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
Jenny Tenney
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Leigh Mattson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.