Teams

Carrollwood - K. Nail

2026 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-03vs Yachty by Nature - J. FrostWon 32
L#1 DoublesKristin Darlison / Nathalie Crane vs Jessica Digiacomo / Julianne Frost3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAshley Gagne vs Monica la Puente6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristin Nail / Karen Wingard vs Lauren Green / Amy Hale6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesErika Sumner vs Sara Edge0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJoanne Gordon / Christina Pedraza vs Morgan Conry / Katy Lannon7-5, 6-2
2025-10-20vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanWon 31
W#1 DoublesKristin Nail / Christina Pedraza vs Marisol Cohen / DIANA POSADA6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLauren Constantine vs Jennifer Miller3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Darlison / Becky Kuntz vs Emelia Flitman / Chet Gowda6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErika Sumner / Jennifer Noll vs Tricia Novak / Barbara Castro6-3, 6-2
2025-10-13vs Westchase Fireballs - P. HayesLost 14
L#1 DoublesLauren Constantine / Joanne Gordon vs Nicole Tamulski / Isabel Norton3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKristin Nail vs Lucia Mentani6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Huffman / Dona Hunsberger vs Cara Anderson / Natalie Kuhn0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesBecky Kuntz vs Megan Ma5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJackie Botet / Raquel Pullaro vs Anna Richardson / Heidi Pogue3-6, 3-6
2025-10-06vs Van Dyke Farms - P. MooreWon 32
W#1 DoublesKristin Nail / Ashley Gagne vs Kathleen Roberts / Audrey Kessler7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNathalie Crane vs Marieglory Quinones6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Huffman / Dru Albano vs Pamela Moore / Sue Maxwell3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesErika Sumner vs Carrie Cataldo3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Pedraza / Megan Brown vs Bridget Harrison / Ludwiga McClendon7-5, 6-4
L#1 DoublesKaren Wingard / Lacy Gregory vs Lisa Marinez / Teresa Ancaya6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKristin Nail vs Cecilia Rattes2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Hayes / Joanne Gordon vs Jian Sun / Catalina Perez4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKristin Darlison / Karen Wilhelm-Mace vs Kimberly Smith / Deborah Brown6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesNathalie Crane / Ashley Gagne vs Carmen Heggen / Sherry Peterson4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristin Nail vs Karen Cachion6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Wilhelm-Mace / Jennifer Noll vs Roseann McNichol / Cindy Arment6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesErika Sumner vs Carrie Bradley7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDona Hunsberger / Raquel Pullaro vs Carol Guidera / Hannah Gabora6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-15vs Cheval Servivors - S. SommerfieldWon 50
W#1 DoublesKristin Darlison / Kristin Nail vs Patricia McCullough / Christine Marshall6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAshley Gagne vs Hanna Fang7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoanne Gordon / Jacqueline Hayes vs Stephanie Skillman / Vera Trayner6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBecky Kuntz vs Misty Revelia6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristina Pedraza / Jennifer Noll vs Susan Sommerfield / Anjali Singh6-2, 6-3
2025-09-08vs Avila - A. StaffordLost 23
L#1 DoublesJoanne Gordon / Kristin Darlison vs Gina Lund / Chris Laihinen3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNathalie Crane vs Giliane Rifai6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDona Hunsberger / Lauren Constantine vs Stacey Lee / Laura Southwell5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesErika Sumner vs Heidi Gonzmart6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDru Albano / Jackie Botet vs Vanessa Bergin / Anne Stafford4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Karen Wingard
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.26
Lacy Gregory
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.25
Ashley Gagne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Kristin Nail
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.08
Christina Pedraza
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.03
Nathalie Crane
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Karen Wilhelm-Mace
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Kristin Darlison
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Becky Kuntz
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.73
Joanne Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.72
Jackie Botet
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.68
Raquel Pullaro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Jennifer Noll
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Suzanne Huffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Erika Sumner
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.64
Dru Albano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Lauren Constantine
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.61
Dona Hunsberger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jacqueline Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Wingard + Kristin Nail24363% games+11.4% vs expected
Raquel Pullaro + Becky Kuntz7753% games+10.3% vs expected
Kristin Darlison + Christina Pedraza6064% games+8.8% vs expected
Kristin Darlison + Becky Kuntz5163% games+6.5% vs expected
Becky Kuntz + Erika Sumner8257% games+4.5% vs expected
Nathalie Crane + Karen Wingard3249% games−1.2% vs expected
Karen Wilhelm-Mace + Christina Pedraza5070% gamesnot enough data
Becky Kuntz + Christina Pedraza4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karen Wingard
117W–68L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Lacy Gregory
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
3.5
Ashley Gagne
11W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Kristin Nail
80W–30L career · 11 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Christina Pedraza
77W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Nathalie Crane
55W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Karen Wilhelm-Mace
32W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Kristin Darlison
60W–65L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Becky Kuntz
53W–61L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Joanne Gordon
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Jackie Botet
17W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.72
3
Raquel Pullaro
72W–68L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Jennifer Noll
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Suzanne Huffman
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Erika Sumner
16W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Dru Albano
11W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%16%84%
2.64
Lauren Constantine
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Dona Hunsberger
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Jacqueline Hayes
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.