Teams

Westchase Fireballs - P. Hayes

2026 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-03vs MiraBay Aces - C. ElwellWon 21
L#1 DoublesCara Anderson / Natalie Kuhn vs Julia Schwerin / Isabelle Conti6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMegan Ma vs Michelle Butler7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIsabel Norton / Heidi Pogue vs Carrie Elwell / Ashley Youngblood6-4, 7-5
2025-10-13vs Carrollwood - K. NailWon 41
W#1 DoublesNicole Tamulski / Isabel Norton vs Lauren Constantine / Joanne Gordon6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLucia Mentani vs Kristin Nail4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCara Anderson / Natalie Kuhn vs Suzanne Huffman / Dona Hunsberger6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMegan Ma vs Becky Kuntz7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Richardson / Heidi Pogue vs Jackie Botet / Raquel Pullaro6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesAshley Sowers / Natalie Kuhn vs Pamela Woodham / Pat Morris6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesNatalie Kuhn / Nicole Tamulski vs Tina Sturdevant / Nikki Spirakis4-6, 0-6
2025-09-22vs Cheval Servivors - S. SommerfieldWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Kuhn / Anna Richardson vs Misty Revelia / Vera Trayner7-6, 6-0
2025-09-15vs Avila - A. StaffordWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Richardson / Natalie Kuhn vs Stacey Lee / Anne Stafford6-3, 6-3
2025-09-08vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Kuhn / Megan Ma vs Kelly Machonis / Marisol Cohen7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Ashley Sowers
published 3
2.99
Lucia Mentani
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Isabel Norton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Natalie Kuhn
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.79
Megan Ma
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.79
Cara Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Carmen Fiorito
published 3
2.70
Heidi Pogue
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Trina Ashour
published
2.60
Amy Ramos
published 3
2.50
Nicole Tamulski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Kyle Roberts
published
2.35
Vanvisa Cheung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cara Anderson + Natalie Kuhn8457% games+0.7% vs expected
Isabel Norton + Ashley Sowers5071% gamesnot enough data
Vanvisa Cheung + Ashley Sowers303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Sowers
12W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Lucia Mentani
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Isabel Norton
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Natalie Kuhn
68W–44L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Megan Ma
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Cara Anderson
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Carmen Fiorito
0W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Heidi Pogue
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Trina Ashour
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Amy Ramos
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Nicole Tamulski
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kyle Roberts
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.38
Vanvisa Cheung
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.