Teams

SS-LGT GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs HRCA-N GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesLindsey Sittko / Lesley Euston vs Molly Stephens / Jieun Chiu7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLindsey McGraw vs Sara Binge6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeni Cuddie / Nicole Poulos vs Annie Kim / Lori Wood6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMelissa Penza / Lori Cerise vs Kari Samborski / Anna Nguyen7-5, 6-2
2025-07-07vs LEBTC PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Poulos / Lesley Euston vs Melinda Grandy / Andrea Reinig7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatti Knepper / Melissa Penza vs Natalie Lucero / Johanna Tiwari4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJeni Cuddie / Karen Keehan Odendahl vs Leanne Franke / Sally Gibson6-3, 6-4
2025-06-30vs SS-HP TEALWon 31
W#1 DoublesLindsey McGraw / Nicole Poulos vs Jennifer Moeller / Meg Benedik6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJenni Poulos vs Diana Treinen6-3, 1-5
W#2 DoublesLindsey Sittko / Lesley Euston vs Miki Lorentz / Becky Newquist6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Keehan Odendahl / Patti Knepper vs Stephanie Dix / Angela Hunt6-1, 6-2
2025-06-23vs KC-RH YELLOWWon 31
L#1 DoublesAmy Noverr / Lindsey Sittko vs Ashley Campsie / Allison Rooney0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJenni Poulos vs Kim Sandman6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLesley Euston / Nicole Poulos vs Kristen Hoffman / Christine Angelini6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Keehan Odendahl / Lori Cerise vs Kathryn Tobey / Julie Madison4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-16vs BM BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesLindsey Sittko / Lori Cerise vs Adrienne Bivens / Neha Sitole4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLindsey McGraw vs Amanda Feldman0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Poulos / Patti Knepper vs Jodie Thompson / Amy Geist7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCherie Mitchell / Melissa Penza vs Jane Carlson / Dawn Cominsky6-2, 7-6
2025-06-09vs KC-RH GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesLindsey McGraw / Lesley Euston vs Nelisha Firestone / DeAnne Smith6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJenni Poulos vs Sara Lynn6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Noverr / Melissa Penza vs Rachel Osborne / Christine McElhinney6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCherie Mitchell / Karen Keehan Odendahl vs Sarah Carlson / Lori Moinet5-7, 6-7
2025-06-02vs CCC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesLesley Euston / Lindsey Sittko vs Janette Wenger / Marci Fisher3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJenni Poulos vs Sara Griffith6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Noverr / Patti Knepper vs Stacey Hicks / Leah Sherwood6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCherie Mitchell / Lori Cerise vs Michele Crowley / Jennifer Whitehouse6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Jenni Poulos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.98
Lori Cerise
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.95
Lesley Euston
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Lindsey McGraw
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.86
Nicole Poulos
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Jeni Cuddie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Lindsey Sittko
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Amy Noverr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Cherie Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Patti Knepper
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Karen Keehan Odendahl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Melissa Penza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Penza + Lori Cerise6166% games+15.6% vs expected
Jeni Cuddie + Nicole Poulos5260% games+9.0% vs expected
Amy Noverr + Patti Knepper6063% games+7.9% vs expected
Cherie Mitchell + Karen Keehan Odendahl4357% games+4.3% vs expected
Amy Noverr + Lindsey Sittko18659% games+2.7% vs expected
Lindsey Sittko + Lesley Euston6355% games−1.6% vs expected
Nicole Poulos + Lesley Euston4253% games−1.9% vs expected
Karen Keehan Odendahl + Lori Cerise4159% games−2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenni Poulos
16W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Lori Cerise
43W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Lesley Euston
57W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Lindsey McGraw
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Nicole Poulos
91W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Jeni Cuddie
54W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Lindsey Sittko
71W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Amy Noverr
109W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Cherie Mitchell
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Patti Knepper
59W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Karen Keehan Odendahl
76W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Melissa Penza
60W–64L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.