Teams

BM BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.06 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs KC-RH YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesDawn Cominsky / Neha Sitole vs Ashley Campsie / Allison Rooney0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Miller / Amy Geist vs Kristen Hoffman / Carolyn Wachuta7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrenda Sears / Kimberly Picchietti vs Alicia Pucci / Christine Angelini4-6, 1-6
2025-07-07vs KC-RH GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Bivens / Neha Sitole vs Sarah Carlson / Nelisha Firestone6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlison Nelligan / Ashley Miller vs Rachel Osborne / Ashley Barto6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJodie Thompson / Jane Carlson vs Judy Delzell / Lori Moinet6-2, 6-4
2025-06-30vs HRCA-N GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmanda Feldman / Adrienne Bivens vs Nicole Gallagher / Lori Wood6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJodie Thompson / Alison Nelligan vs Jade Braithwaite / Jennifer Sekulski-Barton4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDawn Cominsky / Jane Carlson vs Jieun Chiu / Kari Samborski3-6, 4-6
2025-06-23vs SS-HP TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Bivens / Amanda Feldman vs Miki Lorentz / Jennifer Moeller6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlison Nelligan / Amy Geist vs Meg Benedik / Becky Newquist7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Picchietti / Beth Hoffman vs Stephanie Dix / Diana Treinen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-16vs SS-LGT GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Bivens / Neha Sitole vs Lindsey Sittko / Lori Cerise6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmanda Feldman vs Lindsey McGraw6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJodie Thompson / Amy Geist vs Nicole Poulos / Patti Knepper5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJane Carlson / Dawn Cominsky vs Cherie Mitchell / Melissa Penza2-6, 6-7
2025-06-09vs CCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Feldman / Neha Sitole vs Stacey Hicks / Marci Fisher7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAshley Miller / Amy Geist vs Janette Wenger / Nicolette Picerno4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Sperry / Brenda Sears vs Claire Koran / Michele Crowley4-6, 2-6
2025-06-02vs LEBTC PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesNeha Sitole / Dawn Cominsky vs Mary Bakken / Leanne Franke4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJodie Thompson / Alison Nelligan vs Sally Gibson / Melinda Grandy4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Carlson / Kimberly Sperry vs Johanna Tiwari / Kim Kronenberger Hogan4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Adrienne Bivens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Amanda Feldman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Neha Sitole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dawn Cominsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Alison Nelligan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Amy Geist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Kimberly Picchietti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Kimberly Sperry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.22
Jane Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Brenda Sears
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jodie Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodie Thompson + Dawn Cominsky4352% games+0.8% vs expected
Kimberly Sperry + Kimberly Picchietti4649% games−2.4% vs expected
Kimberly Sperry + Brenda Sears2535% games−8.0% vs expected
Jane Carlson + Brenda Sears0723% games−11.0% vs expected
Neha Sitole + Adrienne Bivens6264% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Sperry + Neha Sitole3442% gamesnot enough data
Neha Sitole + Kimberly Picchietti4347% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Picchietti + Adrienne Bivens5157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adrienne Bivens
96W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Amanda Feldman
18W–14L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
3
Neha Sitole
60W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Dawn Cominsky
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Alison Nelligan
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Amy Geist
34W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Kimberly Picchietti
34W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Kimberly Sperry
23W–50L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Jane Carlson
5W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.22
2.5
Brenda Sears
18W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jodie Thompson
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.