Teams

Synergy-Ritchie

2024 2.5 Fall League Men · 2.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-20vs Grip & Rip- VennavelliLost 12
W#1 DoublesPeter Ratcliffe / Kahlil Saad vs ABDULLA NAIM / Trevor Nelson2-6, 7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBart Drogon vs Nicolas Maderafont1-6, 6-3, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRahul Singh / Shuo Li vs Chase Nevels / Rafael Cabrera3-6, 2-6
2024-10-15vs Grip & Rip- VennavelliWon 21
L#1 DoublesKahlil Saad / Shuo Li vs Anand Vennavelli / Trevor Nelson0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesPeter Ratcliffe vs ABDULLA NAIM6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRahul Singh / Bart Drogon vs Chase Nevels / Rafael Cabrera6-4, 6-4
2024-10-08vs Grip & Rip- VennavelliLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeter Ratcliffe / Rizwan Nasir vs ABDULLA NAIM / Chase Nevels3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRahul Singh vs Anand Vennavelli6-0, 1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKahlil Saad / Shuo Li vs Trevor Nelson / Rafael Cabrera3-6, 3-6
2024-10-01vs Grip & Rip- VennavelliLost 12
W#1 DoublesBart Drogon / Peter Ratcliffe vs ABDULLA NAIM / Chase Nevels6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesRahul Singh vs Nicolas Maderafont2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRizwan Nasir / Kahlil Saad vs Anand Vennavelli / Trevor Nelson4-6, 0-6
2024-09-24vs Grip & Rip- VennavelliLost 03
L#1 DoublesBart Drogon / Rahul Singh vs Nicolas Maderafont / Trevor Nelson4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesPeter Ratcliffe vs Anand Vennavelli1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRizwan Nasir / Kahlil Saad vs ABDULLA NAIM / Chase Nevels1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Rahul Singh
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Bart Drogon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.65
Peter Ratcliffe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.27
Kahlil Saad
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.25
Kim Ritchie
published
Rizwan Nasir
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bart Drogon + Rahul Singh5258% games−6.3% vs expected
Peter Ratcliffe + Bart Drogon314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rahul Singh
20W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Bart Drogon
24W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Ratcliffe
25W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.65
Kahlil Saad
6W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
2.27
Kim Ritchie
19W–21L career · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.25
Rizwan Nasir
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.