Teams

Grip & Rip- Vennavelli

2024 2.5 Fall League Men · 2.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 2.83 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-20vs Synergy-RitchieWon 21
L#1 DoublesABDULLA NAIM / Trevor Nelson vs Peter Ratcliffe / Kahlil Saad6-2, 6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNicolas Maderafont vs Bart Drogon6-1, 3-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChase Nevels / Rafael Cabrera vs Rahul Singh / Shuo Li6-3, 6-2
2024-10-15vs Synergy-RitchieLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnand Vennavelli / Trevor Nelson vs Kahlil Saad / Shuo Li6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesABDULLA NAIM vs Peter Ratcliffe2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChase Nevels / Rafael Cabrera vs Rahul Singh / Bart Drogon4-6, 4-6
2024-10-08vs Synergy-RitchieWon 30
W#1 DoublesABDULLA NAIM / Chase Nevels vs Peter Ratcliffe / Rizwan Nasir6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAnand Vennavelli vs Rahul Singh0-6, 6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTrevor Nelson / Rafael Cabrera vs Kahlil Saad / Shuo Li6-3, 6-3
2024-10-01vs Synergy-RitchieWon 21
L#1 DoublesABDULLA NAIM / Chase Nevels vs Bart Drogon / Peter Ratcliffe4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesNicolas Maderafont vs Rahul Singh6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnand Vennavelli / Trevor Nelson vs Rizwan Nasir / Kahlil Saad6-4, 6-0
2024-09-24vs Synergy-RitchieWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicolas Maderafont / Trevor Nelson vs Bart Drogon / Rahul Singh6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAnand Vennavelli vs Peter Ratcliffe6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesABDULLA NAIM / Chase Nevels vs Rizwan Nasir / Kahlil Saad6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Chase Nevels
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Anand Vennavelli
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Trevor Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.55
ABDULLA NAIM
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Nicolas Maderafont
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anand Vennavelli + Trevor Nelson314 matchesnot enough data
ABDULLA NAIM + Trevor Nelson224 matchesnot enough data
Anand Vennavelli + ABDULLA NAIM303 matchesnot enough data
ABDULLA NAIM + Chase Nevels213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chase Nevels
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Anand Vennavelli
30W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
2.84
Trevor Nelson
18W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
2.5
ABDULLA NAIM
21W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%34%66%
2.55
Nicolas Maderafont
18W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.