Teams

DCastain (WSRC)

2022-2023 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 4.0 Women; Daytime

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-01-18vs KSimmons (Life Time) Penn PalsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Castain / Yvette Gama vs Kristy Simmons / Erin Clapham3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLori van Blarcom / Sharon Cranford vs Melissa Spinner / Allison Mitchell1-6, 3-6
2022-12-05vs RKartes/JGrahl (Mountainbrook)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLori van Blarcom / Sharon Cranford vs Laura Clancy / Julie Grahl6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-11-29vs JAdams/Schaeffer (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Castain / Sharon Cranford vs Veronica Schaeffer / Lizzy Scott2-6, 2-6
2022-11-17vs MParker (OPRC) Four RealLost 01
L#1 DoublesYvette Gama / Sharon Cranford vs Krista Wainscott / Christina McWilliams4-6, 5-7
2022-11-12vs KBowman (CSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Castain / Lori van Blarcom vs Lisa Stewart / Ivy Tedrick7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-11-03vs TFunderburk (Life Time) AdvantageWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Castain / Lori van Blarcom vs Teneika Funderburk / Anna McLaughlin6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women; Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Dawn Castain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Sharon Cranford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Yvette Gama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Lori van Blarcom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Cranford + Lori van Blarcom81047% games+9.1% vs expected
Dawn Castain + Yvette Gama231751% games−0.5% vs expected
Sharon Cranford + Yvette Gama7358% games−1.1% vs expected
Lori van Blarcom + Yvette Gama7550% gamesnot enough data
Lori van Blarcom + Dawn Castain5258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Castain
165W–150L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Sharon Cranford
79W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Yvette Gama
166W–126L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Lori van Blarcom
74W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.