Teams

CCRC - Johnson

2026 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '25 · Women 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-15vs CCRC - Ewing/NelsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrittnee Johnson / Megan Stallings vs April Ewing / Tope Obielodan6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSamantha Otis vs Venus Amiri6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesErin Sallette / Erica Pratt vs Allison Toney / Sun Je1-6, 3-6
2025-11-01vs WLCC - LevensWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Otis / Megan Stallings vs Bari Levens / Beth Bazemore6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBrittnee Johnson vs Mary Ann Scraper6-1, 7-5
2025-10-25vs CCRC - Ewing/NelsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Otis / Samantha Otis vs Jodie Cha / Sun Je4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrittnee Johnson vs Camila Gomez Canel6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKirstin Shaffer / Erin Sallette vs Rhonda Durden / Lauren Nelson2-6, 1-6
2025-10-18vs Newman - RaceWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Otis / Kirstin Shaffer vs Glorene Ejikeme / Danielle Obiri6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesErica Pratt vs Susan Waskavitz6-1, 6-2
2025-10-11vs Riverview - VargasWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrittnee Johnson / Erin Otis vs Michelle Harley / Megan Mcdonald6-1, 6-1
2025-09-27vs WLCC - LevensLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Stallings / Erin Sallette vs Lauren Jackson / Holly Hendrix1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesErin Otis vs Tina Watts6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKirstin Shaffer / Sara Skier vs Lori Richardson / Mary Ann Scraper0-6, 1-6
2025-09-13vs Newman - RaceWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamantha Otis / Erica Pratt vs Rossana Lugo / Sydney Race6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKirstin Shaffer vs Susan Waskavitz6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErin Sallette / Mia Shin vs Keonna Perry / Latoya Johnson6-3, 6-1
2025-09-06vs Riverview - VargasWon 30
W#1 DoublesErin Otis / Megan Stallings vs Michelle Harley / Lisa Walker6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSamantha Otis vs Katie Vargas6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErin Sallette / Erica Pratt vs Allison Layman / Megan Mcdonald6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCRC - Johnson7119512116
2WLCC - Levens53141022164
3Riverview - Vargas53121224185
4CCRC - Ewing/Nelson35131123177
5Newman - Race0812346276

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Brittnee Johnson
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.06
Samantha Otis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.53
Erin Otis
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.45
Erica Pratt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.40
Megan Stallings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Erin Sallette
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.22
Kirstin Shaffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.11
Sara Skier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mia Shin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittnee Johnson + Samantha Otis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brittnee Johnson
43W–7L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Samantha Otis
31W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.06
Erin Otis
13W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.53
Erica Pratt
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
Megan Stallings
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Erin Sallette
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Kirstin Shaffer
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Sara Skier
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Mia Shin
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.