Teams

WLCC - Levens

2026 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '25 · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-22vs Riverview - VargasWon 10
W#1 DoublesMorgan Brinson / Mary Ann Scraper vs Allison Layman / Carlie Buchan6-4, 6-0
2025-11-01vs CCRC - JohnsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesBari Levens / Beth Bazemore vs Erin Otis / Megan Stallings1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMary Ann Scraper vs Brittnee Johnson1-6, 5-7
2025-10-18vs CCRC - Ewing/NelsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Ann Scraper / Lauren Jackson vs Camila Gomez Canel / April Ewing6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMorgan Brinson vs Sun Je3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLori Richardson / Tina Watts vs Valerie Haas / Melissa Tyler4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-04vs Riverview - VargasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Jackson / Lori Richardson vs Megan Mcdonald / Allison Layman7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTina Watts vs Katie Vargas2-6, 2-6
2025-09-27vs CCRC - JohnsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Jackson / Holly Hendrix vs Megan Stallings / Erin Sallette6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTina Watts vs Erin Otis2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Richardson / Mary Ann Scraper vs Kirstin Shaffer / Sara Skier6-0, 6-1
2025-09-13vs CCRC - Ewing/NelsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeth Bazemore / Bari Levens vs Jodie Cha / Sun Je1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMorgan Brinson vs Allison Toney6-0, 6-0
2025-09-06vs Newman - RaceWon 20
W#1 DoublesTina Watts / Mary Ann Scraper vs Sydney Race / Susan Waskavitz6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMorgan Brinson vs Nicole Palmer6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCRC - Johnson7119512116
2WLCC - Levens53141022164
3Riverview - Vargas53121224185
4CCRC - Ewing/Nelson35131123177
5Newman - Race0812346276

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Mary Ann Scraper
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.46
Morgan Brinson
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
2.32
Tina Watts
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Holly Hendrix
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Beth Bazemore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Lori Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.16
Bari Levens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Ann Scraper
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Morgan Brinson
19W–24L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
Tina Watts
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Holly Hendrix
10W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Beth Bazemore
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Richardson
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
2.5
Bari Levens
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.