Teams

LCTA18/Wilhelm-Campbell/Maybank

STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Women 6.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.71 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Cynthia Zhang
published 4
3.89
Elaina Cole
published
3.89
Taylor Kent
published
3.84
3.82
Elizabeth Stevens
published
Amy Henderson
published 4
3.70
Savannah Wilhelm
published
3.56
Amber Oblinger
published 4
3.52
Ellen Munson
published
3.29
Allison Soler
published 3.5
Carla Vaca Pinacho
published 3.5
3.25
Yuliia McDonald
published
3.22
Lindsay Eddy
published
3.17
Jocelyn Mills
published
2.48
Brittany Whatley
published 3
Hailey Coleman
published
Jessica Becker
published
Kelsey Barlow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Zhang + Taylor Kent20371% games+13.4% vs expected
Amber Oblinger + Constance Campbell6356% games+4.8% vs expected
Yuliia McDonald + Ellen Munson2447% games−0.3% vs expected
Constance Campbell + Savannah Wilhelm3347% games−5.0% vs expected
Allison Soler + Ellen Munson4164% gamesnot enough data
Amber Oblinger + Elizabeth Stevens404 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Eddy + Cynthia Zhang404 matchesnot enough data
Amy Henderson + Savannah Wilhelm213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Zhang
85W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
Elaina Cole
58W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
Taylor Kent
79W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Constance Campbell
77W–32L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
Elizabeth Stevens
70W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Amy Henderson
38W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Savannah Wilhelm
35W–30L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Amber Oblinger
49W–22L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Ellen Munson
132W–47L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Allison Soler
69W–49L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Carla Vaca Pinacho
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yuliia McDonald
56W–42L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Lindsay Eddy
58W–48L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Jocelyn Mills
45W–33L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Brittany Whatley
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
Hailey Coleman
20W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jessica Becker
31W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelsey Barlow
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.