Teams

CAUGHLIN 40AW4.0A

2023 ADULT 40&Over - Reno · Women's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Anne Inda
published 4
3.86
Dawn Schlagel
published 4
3.82
Amy Engelbert
published 4
3.79
Darcie Watson
published 4
3.78
Amy Gunderson
published 4
3.73
Lou Eftimoff
published
3.71
Dawn Allen
published 4
3.67
Mary Alice Pisani
published
3.63
Natalie Dejan
published
3.58
Jenny Weisberg
published
3.55
Victoria Ness
published
3.49
3.36
Lesley Pittman
published
3.02
Cynthia Chrzan
published 3.5
Kristine Wymore
published
Shelli Tiller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Schlagel + Amy Engelbert404 matchesnot enough data
Lesley Pittman + Victoria Ness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Inda
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Dawn Schlagel
18W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Amy Engelbert
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Darcie Watson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Amy Gunderson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
Lou Eftimoff
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Dawn Allen
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Mary Alice Pisani
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Natalie Dejan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jenny Weisberg
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Victoria Ness
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.55
4
Dorthe Skov Johnston
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Lesley Pittman
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Cynthia Chrzan
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Kristine Wymore
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelli Tiller
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.