Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-19vs MORAGA VALLEY CM7.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeff Bennett / Paul Morrow vs Jeff Feintuck / John Zentner6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesIan Lochen / Maxwell Njelita vs Keyvan Berenjian / Steven Roy6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPeerapong Tantameng / Justin Snyder vs Andrew Barnette / Devin Coyle6-2, 6-2
2025-09-14vs MISSION HILLS CM7.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesBellal Daunish / Alan Lam vs Tao Zhang / Jeff Chang3-6, 1-6
2025-08-25vs MORAGA VALLEY CM7.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesIan Lochen / Stephen Buchholz vs Steven Roy / Peter Holst6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Kyono / Scott Judy vs Andrew Barnette / Jeff Feintuck6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDerek Daymond / Troy Rondeau vs Scott Tukel / Keyvan Berenjian6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Stephen Buchholz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Maxwell Njelita
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Darien Lum
published 4
3.73
Paul Morrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Garvin Tom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Siddharth Nigam
published
3.63
Lloyd Hohenstein
published
3.62
Thinh Vo
published
3.59
Justin Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Dan Helmer
published 3.5
3.58
Scott Judy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Jeff Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Ian Lochen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Peerapong Tantameng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Derek Daymond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Kevin Kyono
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
John Rhee
published
3.25
Frank Xia
published
3.24
Alan Lam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kyle Lofquist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Buchholz + Garvin Tom8259% games+8.3% vs expected
Scott Judy + Maxwell Njelita2444% games−5.3% vs expected
Jeff Bennett + Derek Daymond3258% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Kyono + Dan Helmer404 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Bennett + Kevin Kyono303 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Buchholz + Scott Judy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Buchholz
26W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Maxwell Njelita
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Darien Lum
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Morrow
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Garvin Tom
23W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Siddharth Nigam
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Lloyd Hohenstein
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Thinh Vo
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Justin Snyder
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Dan Helmer
37W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Scott Judy
14W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Jeff Bennett
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Ian Lochen
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Peerapong Tantameng
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Derek Daymond
20W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
Kevin Kyono
28W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
John Rhee
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Frank Xia
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Alan Lam
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Kyle Lofquist
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.