Teams

Ma.Hellner40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-03vs Ba.Wilhelm40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesSharon Horton / Cheryl Sweitzer vs Barbara Wilhelm / Courtney Carey6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShirley Chapman / Angelica Rose vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-19vs St.Grose40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Johnson / Shirley Chapman vs Peggy Williams / Beth Gildea3-6, 1-6
2024-09-12vs Ca.Beaird40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Johnson / Shirley Chapman vs Carole Anne Hussey / Carter Grimes6-2, 6-3
2024-09-05vs Er.Walton40CWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Johnson / Shirley Chapman vs Kelly Sutton / Susan Wilkerson6-4, 7-5
2024-08-29vs Ka.Hedgepeth40CWon 10
W#2 DoublesAngelica Rose / Cheryl Kata vs Kristen Rauth / Debra Vaughn6-3, 6-3
2024-08-25vs Ju.Brown40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Horton / Cheryl Sweitzer vs Sharyn Leaver / Genevieve Daurity6-7, 1-6
2024-08-15vs Tr.Crabtree40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa House / Cheryl Kata vs Amy Hobbs / Amy Gillespie2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTraci Brooks / Shirley Chapman vs Abigail Weaver / Catherine Taylor6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Kimberly McLellan
published
3.31
Melissa House
published
3.28
Kristine Sibillia
published
3.15
Angelica Rose
published 3.5
3.14
Traci Brooks
published
3.10
Sharon Horton
published
3.09
Cheryl Kata
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.85
Carolyn Elliott
published 3
2.83
Brooke Tate
published 3
2.75
Shirley Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Mary Hellner
published 3
2.65
Cheryl Sweitzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shirley Chapman + Mary Hellner7452% gamesnot enough data
Shirley Chapman + Cheryl Kata4454% gamesnot enough data
Angelica Rose + Cheryl Kata224 matchesnot enough data
Shirley Chapman + Carolyn Elliott213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly McLellan
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Melissa House
20W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Kristine Sibillia
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Angelica Rose
9W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Traci Brooks
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Sharon Horton
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cheryl Kata
132W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Carolyn Elliott
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Brooke Tate
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Shirley Chapman
137W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Mary Hellner
55W–63L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Cheryl Sweitzer
57W–117L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.