Teams

WC SGV Dare Doubles-Parmar-WN/SA

2025 Mixed Doubles - 40 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - 6.0 Mixed Division

18 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SGV - 6.0 Mixed Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Manoj Parmar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Sang Ur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Kamron Shahriaree
published
3.37
Geoff Heminway
published 3.5
3.31
Pam Barbato
published 3.5
3.25
Rebecca Berman
published
3.07
Lionel Ochoa
published
3.06
Patrick Mbazuigwe
published 3.5
3.04
Sandra Zane
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Josh Berman
published
2.95
Sabrina Chang
published
2.90
Christine Pedroza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Dave Mondragon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Amy Soong Tsai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Vance Lanoy
published
2.76
Sergio Davila
published
Daniel Zhou
published 3
Jennifer Madden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Manoj Parmar + Amy Soong Tsai10368% games+4.4% vs expected
Manoj Parmar + Sandra Zane224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Manoj Parmar
149W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Sang Ur
57W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
Kamron Shahriaree
51W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Geoff Heminway
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Pam Barbato
100W–64L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
Rebecca Berman
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
Lionel Ochoa
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Patrick Mbazuigwe
55W–10L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Sandra Zane
146W–141L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Josh Berman
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Sabrina Chang
29W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Christine Pedroza
39W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Dave Mondragon
34W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Amy Soong Tsai
89W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.89
Vance Lanoy
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
Sergio Davila
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Daniel Zhou
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Madden
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.