Teams

CDTA S 18&OM4.0 7.STP Zhou Sat 10 $22

1Summer 18&O WN · WE

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 SinglesOmar Montano vs Leo Toyota7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesArgiris Kantzavelos / Andrew Hwang vs Oliver Schmidt / Jorge Valdez3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJoe Carioscia vs Ryan Schmidt1-6, 1-6
2026-07-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJoe Carioscia vs Youngbin Lim0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoey Zhou / Argiris Kantzavelos vs David Chopp / Brad Takei3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesOmar Montano vs Michael McGee6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRyan Zheng / Argiris Kantzavelos vs Deuce Tu / William Irwin6-4, 6-1
2026-06-19Split 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Hwang / Omar Montano vs Andrew Weber / John Li6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJoe Carioscia vs Alexander Mushinskiy0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoey Zhou / Joe Carioscia vs Yuki Iwanari / Hideyuki Natsuaki4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OM4.0 4.RT Ciuca Fri 7 $278033722265
2CDTA S 18&OM4.0 11.Nielsen Hui Sun 5 $2271301025261
3CDTA S 18&OM4.0 9.Tam Huh Sun 1 $2253271331292
4CDTA S 18&OM4.0 8.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $2253241637322
5CDTA S 18&OM4.0 1.CPE Balu Sat 6 $2835162449314
6CDTA S 18&OM4.0 6.FV Takahashi Sat 11 $2535172350373
7CDTA S 18&OM4.0 2.WSC(OUT) Isphording Sun 2 $2235122859379
8CDTA S 18&OM4.0 7.STP Zhou Sat 10 $2226162451340
9zDROPPED CDTA S 18&OM4.0 10.Tam Franks Sat 1 $22000000
10zDROPPED CDTA S 18&OM4.0 5.NTC Podwika Sat 4 $24000000
11CDTA S 18&OM4.0 3.MTC Brown Sun 12 $33.50853574464

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Omar Montano
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Argiris Kantzavelos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Kiwon Nam
published 4
3.71
Vitalii Miziuk
published 4
3.52
DOMINIC KIRSCHBAUM
published 3.5
3.49
Norbert Glod
published 4
3.48
Zhijiong Lin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.47
Joe Carioscia
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Zhefu Chen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.41
Joey Zhou
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Karl Blase
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joey Zhou + Norbert Glod2451% games+6.6% vs expected
Joey Zhou + Zhefu Chen5551% games+4.1% vs expected
Joey Zhou + Vitalii Miziuk6069% gamesnot enough data
Zhefu Chen + Karl Blase2335% gamesnot enough data
Omar Montano + Karl Blase3262% gamesnot enough data
Joey Zhou + DOMINIC KIRSCHBAUM224 matchesnot enough data
Norbert Glod + DOMINIC KIRSCHBAUM134 matchesnot enough data
Zhefu Chen + DOMINIC KIRSCHBAUM044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Omar Montano
51W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Argiris Kantzavelos
46W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Kiwon Nam
97W–85L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Vitalii Miziuk
123W–73L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
DOMINIC KIRSCHBAUM
82W–63L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
4
Norbert Glod
161W–162L career · type A · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Zhijiong Lin
33W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Joe Carioscia
16W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
Zhefu Chen
48W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
Joey Zhou
56W–53L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Karl Blase
48W–54L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.