Teams

CDTA S 18&OM4.0 3.MTC Brown Sun 12 $33.5

1Summer 18&O WN · WE

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesWilliam Irwin / Ryan Jones vs Saburo Koshizawa / Hideaki Takahashi6-7, 5-6
W#2 SinglesNikhil Gaur vs Yuki Iwanari6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesWilliam Irwin / Paul Bennett vs John Leubner / Del Andres3-6, 2-6
2026-07-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Wittenborn / Nikhil Gaur vs Kevin Wang / Will Hu1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJosh Blumenfeld / Chris Wittenborn vs Andrew Hwang / Kiwon Nam1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDeuce Tu / William Irwin vs Ryan Zheng / Argiris Kantzavelos4-6, 1-6
2026-06-07Won 10
W#2 SinglesNikhil Gaur vs Ethan Purrington7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesNikhil Gaur / Deuce Tu vs Adrian Ciuca / Simon Abraham2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OM4.0 4.RT Ciuca Fri 7 $278033722265
2CDTA S 18&OM4.0 11.Nielsen Hui Sun 5 $2271301025261
3CDTA S 18&OM4.0 9.Tam Huh Sun 1 $2253271331292
4CDTA S 18&OM4.0 8.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $2253241637322
5CDTA S 18&OM4.0 1.CPE Balu Sat 6 $2835162449314
6CDTA S 18&OM4.0 6.FV Takahashi Sat 11 $2535172350373
7CDTA S 18&OM4.0 2.WSC(OUT) Isphording Sun 2 $2235122859379
8CDTA S 18&OM4.0 7.STP Zhou Sat 10 $2226162451340
9zDROPPED CDTA S 18&OM4.0 10.Tam Franks Sat 1 $22000000
10zDROPPED CDTA S 18&OM4.0 5.NTC Podwika Sat 4 $24000000
11CDTA S 18&OM4.0 3.MTC Brown Sun 12 $33.50853574464

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jared Burstein
published 4
3.69
Josh Blumenfeld
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
William Irwin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Joseph Guarascio
published
3.63
Nikhil Gaur
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Deuce Tu
published 3.5
3.44
Paul Cowgill
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Matthew Pruyn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Guarascio + Deuce Tu6362% games+7.2% vs expected
Nikhil Gaur + Deuce Tu044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jared Burstein
7W–20L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Josh Blumenfeld
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
William Irwin
18W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Joseph Guarascio
41W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
Nikhil Gaur
38W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
3.5
Deuce Tu
65W–53L career · no lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
Paul Cowgill
19W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Matthew Pruyn
6W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.