Teams

Eppler/55/4.0/MXD/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Mixed 55 & Over · 4.0 Shrev

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-07vs Bryan/55/4.0/MXD/POTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatric Dubois / Becky McFarlain vs Shelly Valiulis / Edmund Brown2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSuzie Morrison / Tad Peters vs Donna Bryan / Chris Howard1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLynn Ferry-Nelson / Robert Kyle vs Franklin Roemer / Ellen White6-4, 6-3
2025-05-29vs Bryan/55/4.0/MXD/POTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesTracy Elliott / Troy Ardoin vs Shelly Valiulis / Edmund Brown2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Eppler / Karen Pharr vs Donna Bryan / Chris Howard1-6, 3-6
2025-04-26vs Bryan/55/4.0/MXD/POTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatric Dubois / Suzie Morrison vs Edmund Brown / Shelly Valiulis3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKevin Shelley / Debra Richardson vs William Whitman / Maude MacK7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTad Peters / Tracy Elliott vs Franklin Roemer / Ellen White6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Kevin Shelley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Tracy Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Patric Dubois
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Troy Ardoin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Lynn Ferry-Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Todd Eppler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Becky McFarlain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Karen Pharr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Robert Kyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Debra Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Suzie Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tad Peters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Shelley
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Tracy Elliott
41W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Patric Dubois
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Troy Ardoin
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Lynn Ferry-Nelson
57W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
Todd Eppler
38W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Becky McFarlain
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Karen Pharr
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Robert Kyle
37W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.48
4
Debra Richardson
21W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
Suzie Morrison
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tad Peters
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.