Teams

Bryan/55/4.0/MXD/POTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Mixed 55 & Over · 4.0 Shrev

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-07vs Eppler/55/4.0/MXD/BTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesShelly Valiulis / Edmund Brown vs Patric Dubois / Becky McFarlain6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDonna Bryan / Chris Howard vs Suzie Morrison / Tad Peters6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesFranklin Roemer / Ellen White vs Lynn Ferry-Nelson / Robert Kyle4-6, 3-6
2025-05-29vs Eppler/55/4.0/MXD/BTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesShelly Valiulis / Edmund Brown vs Tracy Elliott / Troy Ardoin6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDonna Bryan / Chris Howard vs Todd Eppler / Karen Pharr6-1, 6-3
2025-04-26vs Eppler/55/4.0/MXD/BTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesEdmund Brown / Shelly Valiulis vs Patric Dubois / Suzie Morrison6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWilliam Whitman / Maude MacK vs Kevin Shelley / Debra Richardson5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFranklin Roemer / Ellen White vs Tad Peters / Tracy Elliott4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rubben/55/4.0/MXD/QTC4211717145
2Bryan/55/4.0/MXD/POTC4211717145
3Eppler/55/4.0/MXD/BTC1551328195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Chris Howard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Edmund Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Franklin Roemer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Donna Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
William Whitman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Maude MacK
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Havard Yerger
published 4
Shelly Valiulis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Howard + Donna Bryan314 matchesnot enough data
Edmund Brown + Shelly Valiulis303 matchesnot enough data
Chris Howard + Shelly Valiulis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Howard
23W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Edmund Brown
22W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Franklin Roemer
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Donna Bryan
24W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
William Whitman
18W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Maude MacK
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Havard Yerger
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Shelly Valiulis
45W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.