Teams

Jorgenson-Coffield Point Taken

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 4.5 WOMEN

16 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-04vs HANSEN 4.5 - ESLost 05
L#1 DoublesBridget Veldman / Theresa Carlson vs Clare Palen / Emma Wu2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesIsabel Thiner vs Savannah Olson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Martinson / Kristin Hartley vs Nina Lind / Noelle Dougan1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAllison Ranallo vs Natalie Allison3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Bowles / Lauren Madsen vs Dana Hansen / Jill Bailey2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-11-13vs Estey-Alexander 18+ Early StartWon 32
W#1 DoublesKristina Vorpahl / Bridget Veldman vs Brittany Alexander / Sofia Terzic6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAllison Ranallo vs Brooke Hapuku4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Wrobel / Brenda Martinson vs Jane Booth-Tobin / Marti Estey6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJoy Coffield vs Paige Stradley2-6, 5-4
W#3 DoublesAlesha Baerenwald / Julie Bowles vs Andrea Boado / Ann Cadwallader7-5, 6-2
2024-10-23vs HANSEN 4.5 - ESLost 14
L#1 DoublesBridget Veldman / Jessica Schnabel vs Emma Wu / Amy Lamparske6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAllison Ranallo vs Savannah Olson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Carlson / Brenda Martinson vs Shelby Cook / Clare Palen5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesIsabel Thiner vs Natalie Allison5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Madsen / Megan Wrobel vs Pamela Moeller / Patricia White6-1, 6-4
2024-10-09vs Estey-Alexander 18+ Early StartLost 23
L#1 DoublesAllison Ranallo / Joy Coffield vs Mona Oenning / Marti Estey2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLauren Madsen vs Paige Stradley3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTheresa Carlson / Lindsay Whalen vs Cecilia Grass-Neary / Kristine Paul6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesIsabel Thiner vs Cristina Kazda6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlesha Baerenwald / Michelle Finlon vs Genevieve Swanson / Traci Spano5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bridget Veldman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Taylor Reiners
published
4.11
Alesha Baerenwald
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.10
Lauren Madsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.96
Theresa Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.95
Isabel Thiner
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.94
Jessica Schnabel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Brenda Martinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Julie Bowles
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.85
Megan Wrobel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
Allison Ranallo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.57
Michelle Finlon
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Jennifer Jorgenson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joy Coffield
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kristina Vorpahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsay Whalen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Isabel Thiner + Julie Bowles4451% games+6.0% vs expected
Jennifer Jorgenson + Julie Bowles1538% games−9.2% vs expected
Alesha Baerenwald + Julie Bowles314 matchesnot enough data
Isabel Thiner + Theresa Carlson303 matchesnot enough data
Alesha Baerenwald + Theresa Carlson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bridget Veldman
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Reiners
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Alesha Baerenwald
34W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.11
Lauren Madsen
23W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
4.10
Theresa Carlson
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Isabel Thiner
62W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Jessica Schnabel
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Brenda Martinson
12W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.93
Julie Bowles
56W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
Megan Wrobel
34W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Allison Ranallo
19W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Michelle Finlon
18W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Jennifer Jorgenson
6W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Joy Coffield
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristina Vorpahl
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lindsay Whalen
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.