Teams

PRKR GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-01vs HW YELLOWWon 41
W#1 DoublesCindi Turchik / Leena Keshwani vs Sarah Erickson / Crystal Eustis6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJane Burnham vs Brianna Gass4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBeth Laverenz / Sharan Swenski vs Bonnie Olson / Laurie McElroy6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRenae Ludrick vs Jessica Stretz Storm6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLorie Whalen / Shelley Hanna vs Shelly Russell / Nicole Moore6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-31vs CCV REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesLeena Keshwani / Shelley Hanna vs Patricia Colella / Sari Nicholson6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRenae Ludrick vs Christy Battaglia5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCindi Turchik / Darlene Odean vs Carissa Weinfeld / Carrie Miller7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJane Burnham vs Laura Peterson6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLorie Whalen / Tawanda Martin vs Karen Bielenberg / Kirsten Despain4-6, 2-6
2023-05-23vs WC REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesCindi Turchik / Shelley Hanna vs Becca Rinn / Emily Lewis4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRenae Ludrick vs Jamie Gagne6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Laverenz / Darlene Odean vs Laura Ream / Juli Simmermon2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesTawanda Martin vs Jennifer Woodrow2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLeena Keshwani / Sharan Swenski vs Mary Brady / Paula Schmitt6-3, 7-6
2023-05-20vs SS-LT TEALLost 23
L#1 DoublesBeth Laverenz / Sharan Swenski vs Katie Policaro / Gina Schulz5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJane Burnham vs Meredith Beveridge6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCindi Turchik / Leena Keshwani vs Carol Berg / Sara Haynes3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesShelley Hanna vs Ann Reidy6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLorie Whalen / Renae Ludrick vs Angie Van Wyk / Brooke Wolf2-6, 1-6
2023-05-01vs PCC GOLDLost 14
L#1 DoublesDarlene Odean / Shelley Hanna vs Sandra Liberati / Mary Pearce6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesRenae Ludrick vs Misty Candela7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCindi Turchik / Sharan Swenski vs Kelly Bromeier / Donna Lollar3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJane Burnham vs Laura Wren4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Laverenz / Lorie Whalen vs Pamela Smith / Carolyn Watson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-24vs VCC GREENWon 41
W#1 DoublesShelley Hanna / Darlene Odean vs Amy Bergan / Diane Kelly7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRenae Ludrick vs Erika Rippee5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindi Turchik / Sharan Swenski vs Cheryl Georg / Jill Savela6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesTawanda Martin vs Carmen Mix6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Laverenz / Lorie Whalen vs Kim Brogus / Shelbee Riehl6-7, 3-6
2023-04-23vs SS-LT MAROONLost 14
L#1 DoublesDarlene Odean / Cindi Turchik vs Charla Beram / Julie Diep3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJane Burnham vs Rhea McMahon3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRenae Ludrick / Sharan Swenski vs Stevie Vencil / Stacey Feltman5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesShelley Hanna vs Stephanie Fry1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTawanda Martin / Lorie Whalen vs Jennifer Swiecki / Jennifer Renard3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Leena Keshwani
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Sharan Swenski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Cindi Turchik
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.58
Beth Laverenz
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.56
Darlene Odean
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jane Burnham
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Lorie Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Renae Ludrick
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Shelley Hanna
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Tawanda Martin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darlene Odean + Shelley Hanna6157% games+11.9% vs expected
Lorie Whalen + Shelley Hanna8157% games+9.8% vs expected
Cindi Turchik + Leena Keshwani7451% games+2.8% vs expected
Cindi Turchik + Shelley Hanna3351% games+2.4% vs expected
Darlene Odean + Beth Laverenz111251% games−0.4% vs expected
Beth Laverenz + Cindi Turchik2542% games−4.4% vs expected
Darlene Odean + Lorie Whalen1733% games−14.2% vs expected
Darlene Odean + Cindi Turchik2541% games−17.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Leena Keshwani
129W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%5%95%
3.22
Sharan Swenski
8W–12L career · 6 lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Cindi Turchik
37W–61L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Beth Laverenz
59W–78L career · 5 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
Darlene Odean
85W–86L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.56
Jane Burnham
12W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lorie Whalen
18W–35L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Renae Ludrick
13W–10L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelley Hanna
37W–33L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tawanda Martin
4W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.