Teams

SS-LT TEAL

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-29vs HW YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesAudrey Simkins / Sara Haynes vs Sarah Erickson / Crystal Eustis4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Policaro vs Laurie McElroy6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAngie Van Wyk / Gina Schulz vs Sandi Bozanic / Nicole Moore6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-23vs PCC GOLDWon 21
W#1 SinglesMeredith Beveridge vs Laura Wren3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngie Van Wyk / Kimberly Jester vs Nancy Meyer / Donna Lollar5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAudrey Simkins vs Pamela Smith6-1, 6-4
2023-05-22vs WC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesGina Schulz / Katie Policaro vs Dana Sandberg / Jamie Gagne3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMeredith Beveridge vs Becca Rinn6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAudrey Simkins vs SUSAN MORAVEK2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAngie Van Wyk / Kimberly Jester vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-20vs PRKR GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Policaro / Gina Schulz vs Beth Laverenz / Sharan Swenski7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMeredith Beveridge vs Jane Burnham7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngie Van Wyk / Brooke Wolf vs Lorie Whalen / Renae Ludrick6-2, 6-1
2023-05-01vs VCC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesGina Schulz / Katie Policaro vs Diane Kelly / Emily Yeingst1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMeredith Beveridge vs Jill Savela6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngie Van Wyk / Audrey Simkins vs Stephanie Geller / Carmen Mix6-3, 6-2
2023-04-24vs SS-LT MAROONLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngie Van Wyk / Audrey Simkins vs Stacey Feltman / Stevie Vencil0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMeredith Beveridge vs Stephanie Fry2-6, 3-6
2023-04-17vs CCV REDWon 21
W#1 SinglesMeredith Beveridge vs Lisa Hardin6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAudrey Simkins / Angie Van Wyk vs Laura Peterson / Taylor Spalding6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Policaro / Gina Schulz vs Carrie Miller / Fernanda Solis6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Meredith Beveridge
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.80
Katie Policaro
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Angie Van Wyk
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.69
Audrey Simkins
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Ann Reidy
published 3
2.52
Carol Berg
published 3
2.50
Brooke Wolf
published 3
2.50
Kimberly Jester
published
Gina Schulz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Simkins + Angie Van Wyk273246% games−1.6% vs expected
Kimberly Jester + Brooke Wolf134 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Wolf + Carol Berg044 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Jester + Carol Berg123 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Wolf + Angie Van Wyk033 matchesnot enough data
Carol Berg + Ann Reidy213 matchesnot enough data
Carol Berg + Angie Van Wyk033 matchesnot enough data
Angie Van Wyk + Meredith Beveridge213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Meredith Beveridge
88W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Katie Policaro
50W–66L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Angie Van Wyk
77W–106L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Audrey Simkins
49W–88L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Ann Reidy
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Carol Berg
10W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
2.52
3
Brooke Wolf
9W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Kimberly Jester
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Gina Schulz
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.