Teams

DTP NAVY

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-19vs SS-LT PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Skarwecki / Jose Amador vs Rory Jaggers / James Jaggers6-2, 6-2
2024-05-12vs WP ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Richey / Jose Amador vs Elise Engleberg / Louis Engleberg3-6, 2-6
2024-05-05vs SS-H GOLDWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatherine Richey / Jose Amador vs Sarah Bracken / Benjamin Walker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-28vs RRTC ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesJose Amador / Stephanie Skarwecki vs Phillip Urrutia / Dorothy Ripka3-6, 3-6
2024-04-14vs GAC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Skarwecki / Jose Amador vs Maeve Kearney / Shawn Iben2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Gretchen Wilder
published
4.60
Diana Solanki
published 5
4.46
Stephanie Skarwecki
published 4.5
4.44
Madison Hoffman
published
4.32
Katherine Richey
published
4.25
Jose Amador
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 4.5
4.25
Caitlin Finn
published 4.5
4.19
Alberto Gutierrez
published 4.5
4.16
Nicholas Hoelmer
published
4.16
John Blue
published
3.55
Rob Mullins
published
Seth Brislin
published
Teresa Crane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Skarwecki + Jose Amador3345% gamesnot enough data
John Blue + Teresa Crane224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gretchen Wilder
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.83
5
Diana Solanki
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
Stephanie Skarwecki
30W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
4.46
Madison Hoffman
31W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
4.44
Katherine Richey
24W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Jose Amador
315W–162L career · 11 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Caitlin Finn
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Alberto Gutierrez
14W–13L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Nicholas Hoelmer
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
John Blue
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Rob Mullins
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.55
Seth Brislin
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Teresa Crane
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.