Teams

AC/Deu-C

2026 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Brashear/55&Over9.0W6013513124
2AC/Deu-C0651328192

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Andrea Gillis
published 4.5
4.22
Shelley Ware
published 4.5
4.16
Heather Silverman
published 4.5
4.00
Debbie Merritt
published 4
3.96
Kristen Jacobs
published 4
3.96
Vicki McBride
published
3.92
3.87
Sandra Cashen
published 4
3.86
Kathy Scribner
published 4
3.84
Beth Calvo
published 4
Jo Ann Kurz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Jacobs + Kathy Scribner7260% games+4.1% vs expected
Kristen Jacobs + Beth Calvo11555% games+3.9% vs expected
Vicki McBride + Shelley Ware7857% games−1.1% vs expected
Vicki McBride + Debbie Merritt4543% games−6.0% vs expected
Jo Ann Kurz + Vicki McBride4251% gamesnot enough data
Jo Ann Kurz + Patricia Bergstrand044 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Bergstrand + Beth Calvo134 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Merritt + Shelley Ware134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrea Gillis
98W–57L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Shelley Ware
144W–92L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Heather Silverman
82W–85L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.16
4
Debbie Merritt
205W–117L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Kristen Jacobs
208W–89L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
Vicki McBride
154W–127L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Patricia Bergstrand
77W–56L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Sandra Cashen
12W–32L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Kathy Scribner
87W–43L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Beth Calvo
168W–125L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
Jo Ann Kurz
21W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.