Teams

Idaho/Brashear/55&Over9.0W

2026 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 4.46 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-06-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Goyette / Phyllis Zilm vs Beth Calvo / Kristen Jacobs6-3, 6-1
2026-06-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesPhyllis Zilm / Karen Wells vs Patricia Bergstrand / Beth Calvo6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Brashear/55&Over9.0W6013513124
2AC/Deu-C0651328192

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Karen Wells
published 4.5
4.45
Kathy Brashear
published 4.5
4.44
Kathleen Goyette
published 4.5
4.26
Mila Wood
published 4.5
4.19
Jody Mallane
published 4.5
4.18
Bobette Wood
published 4.5
4.10
Debbie Wachtell
published 4.5
4.03
Ashley Davis
published 4.5
3.98
Kerri Porritt
published 4.5
3.95
Carmen Little
published 4.5
3.95
Dana Rosellini
published 4.5
3.62
Laura Larsen
published 4
Phyllis Zilm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Brashear + Karen Wells5174% games+7.9% vs expected
Kathy Brashear + Bobette Wood351361% games+2.6% vs expected
Kathleen Goyette + Kathy Brashear13266% games+2.0% vs expected
Jody Mallane + Mila Wood6256% games+0.6% vs expected
Kathy Brashear + Mila Wood9262% games−0.6% vs expected
Kerri Porritt + Bobette Wood6066% games−2.8% vs expected
Bobette Wood + Mila Wood10264% games−4.1% vs expected
Carmen Little + Debbie Wachtell171355% games−8.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Karen Wells
39W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
4.58
4.5
Kathy Brashear
172W–68L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Kathleen Goyette
46W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Mila Wood
118W–84L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Jody Mallane
183W–95L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Bobette Wood
280W–114L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Debbie Wachtell
94W–54L career · no lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Ashley Davis
9W–16L career · type S · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Kerri Porritt
126W–66L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.98
4.5
Carmen Little
70W–64L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.95
4.5
Dana Rosellini
134W–115L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Laura Larsen
17W–10L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Phyllis Zilm
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.