Teams

LCTA55/Vaughn/LTPDI

STA 55 & Over Combo Doubles · 55 & Over Combo - Women 5.5

14 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-28vs LCTA55/Greely/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeannie Kane / Eileen McIntosh vs Alana Garnett / Lisa Funaro-DeLalla2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Moore / Patricia Anderson vs Lisa Vadakin / Laura Potter2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Curtis / Charlene Vaughn vs Elizabeth Myrick / Marian Greely7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-21vs LCTA55/McElhiney/PineForestLost 01
L#2 DoublesSudie Sullivan / Jeannie Kane vs Shirley Hunter-Welch / Kimberly Morrow2-6, 0-6
2026-08-14vs LCTA55/Portman/MPRLost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen McIntosh / Michele Duffy vs Amira Cranor / Wendy Miller3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeannie Kane / Patricia Anderson vs Susan Hancock / Jane Miller2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCharlene Vaughn / Janet Machado vs Kristin Cheeseman / Mary Lowe2-6, 4-6
2026-08-07vs LCTA55/Greely/CTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesLiz Hilton / Sudie Sullivan vs Susan Comer / Julie Smith4-6, 0-6
2026-07-31vs LCTA55/McElhiney/PineForestWon 21
L#1 DoublesRosemarie Coakley / Lisa Moore vs Karen Walker / Kimberly Morrow1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLiz Hilton / Sudie Sullivan vs Pauline Collier / Lilly Wheeler7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatricia Anderson / Kimberly Pearson vs Trudy Holder / Liz Hazen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-24vs LCTA55/Portman/MPRLost 12
L#1 DoublesEileen McIntosh / Jean Breeding vs Linda Veneman / Mary Lowe6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Anderson / Sudie Sullivan vs Kristin Cheeseman / Emily Ulrich2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCharlene Vaughn / Kathleen Mullery vs Penny Portman / Jane Miller6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-17vs LCTA55/Greely/CTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesRosemarie Coakley / Jean Breeding vs Deborah Faulkner / Lisa Vadakin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDawn Robertson / Beth Curtis vs Amy McCandless / Lynn Curry5-3
L#3 DoublesCarol Jessop / Sudie Sullivan vs Catherine Farrell / Julie Smith4-6, 1-6
2026-07-10vs LCTA55/McElhiney/PineForestSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSudie Sullivan / Kathleen Mullery vs Laurie Fletcher / Chris Grund3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Nelson / Janet Machado vs Karen Walker / Karen Tsukalas6-2, 6-3
2024-10-25vs LCTA55/Greely/CTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Matoske / Sudie Sullivan vs Laura Potter / Lisa Funaro-DeLalla4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKaren Massarotti / Beth Curtis vs Marian Greely / Roberta O'Shea3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo - Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Dawn Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Eileen McIntosh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Rosemarie Coakley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Kathleen Mullery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Liz Hilton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Janet Machado
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Kimberly Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Sudie Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.19
Jeannie Kane
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.14
Beth Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Janet Nelson
published
Jani Gunsaulus
published
Michele Duffy
published
Patricia Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sudie Sullivan + Beth Curtis2441% games+6.2% vs expected
Janet Machado + Kathleen Mullery4158% gamesnot enough data
Eileen McIntosh + Jeannie Kane044 matchesnot enough data
Rosemarie Coakley + Kathleen Mullery303 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Mullery + Kimberly Pearson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dawn Robertson
4W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
9%89%1%
2.68
Eileen McIntosh
2W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Rosemarie Coakley
44W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Kathleen Mullery
29W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Liz Hilton
14W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
Janet Machado
20W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.32
Kimberly Pearson
16W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Sudie Sullivan
15W–51L career · 7 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.29
Jeannie Kane
5W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.19
2.5
Beth Curtis
5W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
Janet Nelson
3W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jani Gunsaulus
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michele Duffy
10W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Anderson
4W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.