Teams

LCTA55/McElhiney/PineForest

STA 55 & Over Combo Doubles · 55 & Over Combo - Women 5.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-09-02vs LCTA55/Greely/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Morrow / Karen Walker vs Lisa Vadakin / Laura Potter1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLibby Davis / Liz Hazen vs Alana Garnett / Deborah Faulkner1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy McElhiney / Mary Mitchell vs Amy McCandless / Elizabeth Myrick4-6, 1-6
2026-08-28vs LCTA55/Portman/MPRLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Walker / Kimberly Morrow vs Danher Wang / Mary Lowe2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShirley Hunter-Welch / Lilly Wheeler vs Susan Hancock / Jane Miller0-6, 4-6
2026-08-21vs LCTA55/Vaughn/LTPDIWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Grund / Laurie Fletcher vs Carol Jessop / Janet Nelson6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShirley Hunter-Welch / Kimberly Morrow vs Sudie Sullivan / Jeannie Kane6-2, 6-0
2026-08-14vs LCTA55/Greely/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTrudy Holder / Kimberly Morrow vs Lisa Vadakin / Deborah Faulkner5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPauline Collier / Karen Walker vs Susan Comer / Amy McCandless3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Mitchell / Libby Davis vs Marian Greely / Elizabeth Myrick4-6, 2-6
2026-08-07vs LCTA55/Portman/MPRLost 02
L#1 DoublesPauline Collier / Laurie Fletcher vs Danher Wang / Debbie Avinger0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShirley Hunter-Welch / Lilly Wheeler vs Emily Ulrich / Susan Hancock4-6, 2-6
2026-07-31vs LCTA55/Vaughn/LTPDILost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Walker / Kimberly Morrow vs Rosemarie Coakley / Lisa Moore6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPauline Collier / Lilly Wheeler vs Liz Hilton / Sudie Sullivan5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTrudy Holder / Liz Hazen vs Patricia Anderson / Kimberly Pearson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-24vs LCTA55/Greely/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Walker / Kimberly Morrow vs Susan Comer / Lisa Funaro-DeLalla4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPeggy McElhiney / Liz Hazen vs Lisa Vadakin / Deborah Faulkner1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShirley Hunter-Welch / Mary Mitchell vs Joanne Johnston / Amy McCandless0-6, 5-7
2026-07-17vs LCTA55/Portman/MPRWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Morrow / Trudy Holder vs Amira Cranor / Mary Lowe0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Grund / Laurie Fletcher vs Danher Wang / Emily Ulrich3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Hawthorne / Karen Tsukalas vs Linda Veneman / Bari Kahn1-6, 1-6
2026-07-10vs LCTA55/Vaughn/LTPDISplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaurie Fletcher / Chris Grund vs Sudie Sullivan / Kathleen Mullery6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Walker / Karen Tsukalas vs Janet Nelson / Janet Machado2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo - Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Laurie Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Trudy Holder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Shirley Hunter-Welch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Chris Grund
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.39
Libby Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Peggy McElhiney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Dora Altman
published 2.5
2.16
Lilly Wheeler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Kimberly Morrow
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.01
Liz Hazen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
1.99
Pauline Collier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Tsukalas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Libby Davis + Laurie Fletcher6255% games+3.8% vs expected
Libby Davis + Trudy Holder2348% games+0.9% vs expected
Shirley Hunter-Welch + Trudy Holder5253% games−1.4% vs expected
Peggy McElhiney + Trudy Holder4443% games−4.4% vs expected
Dora Altman + Karen Tsukalas1430% games−11.6% vs expected
Dora Altman + Peggy McElhiney1429% games−19.0% vs expected
Libby Davis + Chris Grund3349% gamesnot enough data
Dora Altman + Libby Davis134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Fletcher
52W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Trudy Holder
30W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
Shirley Hunter-Welch
25W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Chris Grund
12W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Libby Davis
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.39
Peggy McElhiney
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.38
2.5
Dora Altman
7W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lilly Wheeler
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Kimberly Morrow
13W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Liz Hazen
2W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Pauline Collier
5W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
1.99
Karen Tsukalas
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.