Teams

Fall Winners - Pelican Bay Park - J. Brown

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-12-09vs Lakeside Naples - PollockWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarina Eschoyez-Quiroga / Alejandra Acuna vs Kim Craig / Victoria Pollock3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2020-12-02vs Longshore Lake - KriekLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynn Mariotti / Alejandra Acuna vs Katherine MacWilliams / Darlene Carpenter6-7, 4-6
2020-11-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlejandra Acuna / Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-11-02vs Pelican Bay Park - BeaudetLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarina Eschoyez-Quiroga / Christine Siciliano vs Christine Kriss / Natalie Cortese2-6, 5-7
2020-10-21vs Verona Walk - LeeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarina Eschoyez-Quiroga / Lisa MacIas vs Maria Riccio / Mary Taylor1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2020-10-14vs Olde Cypress - LoomisLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynn Mariotti / Gretchen Landolt vs Sara Munholland / Katie Lober - *4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Eileen Valerio
published 4
3.73
Alejandra Acuna
published 4
3.62
Kelly Stein
published
3.46
Gretchen Landolt
published 4
3.45
Christine Siciliano
published 3.5
3.38
Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Katherine Morehead
published
3.21
Maristela Battilana
published
2.97
Lynn Mariotti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga + Lynn Mariotti9949% games+3.1% vs expected
Eileen Valerio + Kelly Stein5250% games−6.3% vs expected
Alejandra Acuna + Lynn Mariotti5254% gamesnot enough data
Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga + Alejandra Acuna404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eileen Valerio
16W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Alejandra Acuna
106W–49L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Kelly Stein
9W–2L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Gretchen Landolt
11W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Christine Siciliano
12W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga
153W–106L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.38
Katherine Morehead
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
Maristela Battilana
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Lynn Mariotti
90W–119L career · 2 lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.