Teams

Lakeside Naples - Pollock

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2020-12-16vs Longshore Lake - KriekWon 10
W#1 DoublesTina Jaquess / Victoria Pollock vs Rebecca Gutschow / Marcia Erpenbeck4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesTina Jaquess / Jacqui ONeal Privitere vs Gretchen Landolt / Marie Veintimilla7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEileen Komanecky vs Maristela Battilana3-6, 3-6
2020-12-02vs Talis Park - Hurt-SimmonsWon 10
W#2 DoublesTina Jaquess / Cheryl Rauch vs Barbara Hurt-Simmons / Linda Koenig2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-11-18vs Marco YMCA - StrangerLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Craig / Eileen Komanecky vs Mia Delk / Kelly Heintzelman4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Pollock / Tina Jaquess vs Linda Hayes / Ashley Hayes4-6, 1-6
2020-11-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesVictoria Pollock / Tina Jaquess vs Susan Lee / Mary Taylor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2020-11-04vs Pelican Bay Park - BeaudetWon 10
W#2 DoublesVictoria Pollock / Cheryl Rauch vs Susan Phelps / Krista Lombardo6-3, 7-6
2020-10-29vs Marco YMCA - BurschLost 02
L#1 DoublesVictoria Pollock / Cheryl Rauch vs Renee Facciola / Dana Sacks5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEileen Komanecky / Eileen Hung vs Dana Bursch / Shirley Steffen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2020-10-28vs Olde Cypress - LoomisLost 01
L#2 DoublesEileen Hung / Eileen Komanecky vs Rosemary Rolak / Marlea Bowser1-6, 2-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Beth Rainey
published 3.5
3.33
Eileen Komanecky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Tina Jaquess
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.25
Cheryl Rauch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Victoria Pollock
published
2.97
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Jaquess + Victoria Pollock3447% games−6.9% vs expected
Tina Jaquess + Cheryl Rauch3347% gamesnot enough data
Eileen Komanecky + Cheryl Rauch3255% gamesnot enough data
Tina Jaquess + Eileen Komanecky123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Rainey
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Eileen Komanecky
70W–71L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.33
Tina Jaquess
105W–80L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cheryl Rauch
106W–90L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
Victoria Pollock
10W–13L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Jacqui ONeal Privitere
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.