Teams

Talis Park - Hurt-Simmons

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-12-09vs Marco YMCA - BurschLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Oberweis / Claudia Hammon vs Jennifer Ball / Renee Facciola2-6, 4-6
2020-12-02vs Lakeside Naples - PollockWon 10
W#1 DoublesRegina Gracie / Claudia Hammon vs Jacqui ONeal Privitere / Victoria Pollock2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesClaudia Hammon vs Maristela Battilana0-6, 1-6
2020-10-28vs Marco YMCA - StrangerLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Hurt-Simmons / Claudia Hammon vs Linda Keely / Mary Fischer0-6, 5-7
2020-10-27vs Pelican Bay Park - BeaudetWon 10
W#2 DoublesClaudia Hammon / Lisa Ganzhorn vs Heidi Hagood / Karen Romine7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2020-10-14vs Verona Walk - LeeLost 01
L#1 SinglesClaudia Hammon vs Judi Howard1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Linda Koenig
published
3.18
2.94
Claudia Hammon
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Glenna Haas
published 3
Julie Oberweis
published
Michelle Manco
published
Regina Gracie
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Koenig
51W–27L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Hurt-Simmons
11W–15L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Claudia Hammon
80W–104L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
2.94
3
Glenna Haas
18W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Oberweis
16W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Manco
16W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Regina Gracie
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.