Teams

WP RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-23vs APR REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Nobles / Kyle Koontz vs Bruce Eldredge / William Mahaffy6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesErik Graver / Adam Ferry vs Kevin Matney / Kenneth Moyer3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBRIAN ROSENTHAL / Daniel Chin vs Jack Kirtland / Richard Pond2-6, 3-6
2021-07-19vs SKY BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Nobles / Kyle Koontz vs Daniel Cho / Brian Winterling1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAli Barghelame / Erik Graver vs Chris Burckhardt / David Bacon4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRandal Ankeney / Daniel Chin vs Chad Murray / Neal OConnor7-6, 6-4
2021-07-12vs GAC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesBRIAN ROSENTHAL / Kyle Koontz vs Mike Mooney / Michael Runda0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAdam Ferry vs David Longcope1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Nobles / Randal Ankeney vs Patrick Reed / Martin Rankin3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJustin Jelinek / Jeff Kinzler vs Barry Gleichenhaus / Mark Arlen2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-28vs GTC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Chin / Adam Ferry vs Rick Lannon / Thomas O'Keefe5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAli Barghelame / Bryan Humphrys vs Richard Abernethy / Jonathan Watkin7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErik Graver / Jeff Kinzler vs Rich DeGuevara / Paul Haberman6-4, 6-0
2021-06-21vs CACM GOLDLost 04
L#1 DoublesAli Barghelame / Daniel Chin vs Brian Berglund / John Feldman3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBRIAN ROSENTHAL vs Michael Sanders3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBryan Humphrys / Kyle Koontz vs Daniel Friesen / Sean Essex4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJustin Jelinek / Jeff Kinzler vs Brian Wylie / Brent Slosky3-6, 2-6
2021-06-14vs SKY BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesBRIAN ROSENTHAL / Adam Ferry vs Chris Burckhardt / Daniel Cho5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Nobles / Ali Barghelame vs Scott Tobias / Mark Martinet4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJustin Jelinek / Jeff Kinzler vs Matt Moon / Chad Murray3-6, 5-7
2021-06-07vs GAC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesDaniel Chin / Kyle Koontz vs David Schott / David Longcope2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBRIAN ROSENTHAL vs Marcus McAskin6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRandal Ankeney / Jonathan Bach vs Mike Mooney / Martin Rankin7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAli Barghelame / Michael Nobles vs Michael Runda / Mark Arlen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Randal Ankeney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Bryan Humphrys
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Ali Barghelame
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Michael Nobles
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Jonathan Bach
published
3.64
Adam Ferry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Erik Graver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
BRIAN ROSENTHAL
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.54
Daniel Chin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.30
Jeff Kinzler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Justin Jelinek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Koontz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ali Barghelame + Randal Ankeney7155% games+8.0% vs expected
Ali Barghelame + Michael Nobles2549% games+5.4% vs expected
Daniel Chin + BRIAN ROSENTHAL71546% games+0.0% vs expected
Erik Graver + Ali Barghelame71146% games−0.8% vs expected
Jeff Kinzler + Justin Jelinek53037% games−8.5% vs expected
Jeff Kinzler + Randal Ankeney1439% games−8.6% vs expected
Jeff Kinzler + Jonathan Bach134 matchesnot enough data
Erik Graver + Daniel Chin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randal Ankeney
32W–30L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Bryan Humphrys
5W–29L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Ali Barghelame
57W–58L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Michael Nobles
69W–78L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
Jonathan Bach
12W–32L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Adam Ferry
6W–19L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Erik Graver
21W–42L career · 3 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
BRIAN ROSENTHAL
26W–56L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Daniel Chin
46W–44L career · 5 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Jeff Kinzler
37W–52L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Justin Jelinek
12W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%89%1%
3.17
Kyle Koontz
11W–23L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.