Teams

GAC BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.86 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-19vs APR REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesBarry Gleichenhaus / Gregory Kaczmarczyk vs Bruce Eldredge / William Mahaffy2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Longcope vs John Cordova3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMike Mooney / Michael Runda vs Charles Snethen / Sebastian DeBenedittis6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Reed / Martin Rankin vs Richard Pond / Jack Kirtland6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-07-12vs WP REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesMike Mooney / Michael Runda vs BRIAN ROSENTHAL / Kyle Koontz6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDavid Longcope vs Adam Ferry6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatrick Reed / Martin Rankin vs Michael Nobles / Randal Ankeney6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBarry Gleichenhaus / Mark Arlen vs Justin Jelinek / Jeff Kinzler6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-05vs GTC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesDavid Schott / Michael Runda vs Rick Lannon / Jonathan Watkin7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDavid Longcope vs Marshall Nichols7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarcus McAskin / Mike Mooney vs Richard Abernethy / Eric Mayer3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMartin Rankin / Barry Gleichenhaus vs Paul Haberman / John Darden6-0, 6-1
2021-06-28vs CACM GOLDLost 13
L#1 DoublesBarry Gleichenhaus / Mike Mooney vs Tim Hester / John Feldman4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Longcope vs Will Ricketts6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Schott / Michael Runda vs Brian Wylie / Brian Berglund6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Reed / Martin Rankin vs Michael Sanders / Brent Slosky5-7, 5-7
2021-06-21vs SKY BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesPatrick Reed / Marcus McAskin vs Daniel Cho / Scott Tobias3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Longcope vs Neal OConnor6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMike Mooney / David Schott vs John Barker / Chris Burckhardt6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Runda / Martin Rankin vs Brian Winterling / David Bacon4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-06-15vs APR REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMartin Rankin / Patrick Reed vs John Cordova / Mark Kruk3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Longcope vs Sebastian DeBenedittis3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Schott / Michael Runda vs Kenneth Moyer / Charles Snethen6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBarry Gleichenhaus / Robert Olson vs Richard Pond / Jack Kirtland4-6, 5-7
2021-06-07vs WP REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Schott / David Longcope vs Daniel Chin / Kyle Koontz6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMarcus McAskin vs BRIAN ROSENTHAL4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMike Mooney / Martin Rankin vs Randal Ankeney / Jonathan Bach5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Runda / Mark Arlen vs Ali Barghelame / Michael Nobles4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
David Longcope
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.81
Martin Rankin
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.72
Marcus McAskin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Michael Runda
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.59
Patrick Reed
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.37
Barry Gleichenhaus
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Gregory Kaczmarczyk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mark Arlen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Longcope + Michael Runda6067% games+10.0% vs expected
Patrick Reed + Martin Rankin151854% games+3.5% vs expected
Patrick Reed + Marcus McAskin2449% gamesnot enough data
Michael Runda + Marcus McAskin134 matchesnot enough data
Marcus McAskin + Martin Rankin134 matchesnot enough data
Barry Gleichenhaus + Mark Arlen224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Runda + Mark Arlen303 matchesnot enough data
Michael Runda + Martin Rankin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Longcope
81W–19L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%55%44%
3.98
4
Martin Rankin
55W–58L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Marcus McAskin
37W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Michael Runda
93W–63L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Patrick Reed
58W–138L career · 5 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Barry Gleichenhaus
16W–33L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Gregory Kaczmarczyk
22W–35L career · 1 line in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Mark Arlen
38W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mike Mooney
12W–12L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.