Teams

CSU

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-25vs HMTC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesRick Wehmeyer / Gordon Motley vs Steven Tucker / Kim Bender6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Rose / Robert Rubin vs Glenn Gibson / Bob Barcell6-2, 6-2
2021-06-11vs LTALost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Rose / Jon Leydens vs Timothy Morneau / Marlin Godown6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2021-06-04vs HMTC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Wehmeyer / Rick Mohr vs Wayne Snyder / Bobby Diaz4-6, 5-7
2021-05-14vs HMTC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGordon Motley / Rick Wehmeyer vs David Fanning / Steven Tucker2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJon Leydens / James Rose vs Kent Mueller / Kim Bender0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-04-30vs HMTC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Wehmeyer / James Rose vs Michael Jamieson / Chris Moore4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gordon Motley
published 4
3.49
Rick Wehmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
James Rose
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrew Hiller
published 3.5
3.10
Ernest Chavez
published 3.5
3.06
Mike Keefe
published 3.5
Bob Ripp
published
Jon Leydens
published
Rick Mohr
published
Scott Kunze
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Rose + Rick Wehmeyer1540% gamesnot enough data
Rick Wehmeyer + Jon Leydens3256% gamesnot enough data
Mike Keefe + Andrew Hiller1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gordon Motley
28W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Rick Wehmeyer
24W–32L career · 4 lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
James Rose
29W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Andrew Hiller
23W–18L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Ernest Chavez
14W–20L career · no lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Mike Keefe
36W–30L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.06
Bob Ripp
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jon Leydens
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rick Mohr
12W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Kunze
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.