Teams

LTA

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-02vs HMTC NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesEd Kellogg / Dan McGlothlin vs Steven Tucker / John Agin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-25vs HMTC GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesDan McGlothlin / Richard Stitt vs Bobby Diaz / Bret Holcomb2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-04vs FCCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesDan McGlothlin / Jon Messick vs Peter Corran / Joseph Maurier6-3, 6-1
2021-05-14vs HMTC GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesDan McGlothlin / Richard Stitt vs Jeff Nyland / Richard Penhale4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-07vs CSUWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Kostecki / Dan McGlothlin vs Michael Tyler / Andrew Hiller7-5, 6-1
2021-04-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesJere Barto / Dan McGlothlin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Leonard Martinez
published
3.66
Ed Kellogg
published 3.5
3.65
Richard Stitt
published 3.5
3.61
Scott Hemphill
published
3.52
Dan McGlothlin
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Jere Barto
published
Jon Messick
published
Mark Ackermann
published
Marlin Godown
published
Richard Kostecki
published
Timothy Morneau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Hemphill + Timothy Morneau6452% games+12.0% vs expected
Dan McGlothlin + Ed Kellogg3251% gamesnot enough data
Jere Barto + Timothy Morneau4160% gamesnot enough data
Jon Messick + Ed Kellogg5070% gamesnot enough data
Dan McGlothlin + Mark Ackermann314 matchesnot enough data
Richard Stitt + Ed Kellogg314 matchesnot enough data
Jere Barto + Scott Hemphill213 matchesnot enough data
Richard Kostecki + Richard Stitt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leonard Martinez
49W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%5%95%
3.71
3.5
Ed Kellogg
58W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%10%90%
3.66
3.5
Richard Stitt
46W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%12%88%
3.65
Scott Hemphill
30W–27L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Dan McGlothlin
91W–41L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%43%57%
3.52
Jere Barto
15W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jon Messick
19W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Ackermann
10W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marlin Godown
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Richard Kostecki
11W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Timothy Morneau
22W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.