Teams

Team 12 Inoculated Shots

2021 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-26vs Team 7 OVER SERVED AGAIN 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesEve Weber / Aldona Petraitis vs Dawn Word / Erica Gormley6-4, 6-2
2021-07-24vs Team 2 Sassy SmashersWon 10
W#2 DoublesColleen Gustavson / Aldona Petraitis vs Susan Douglas / Julie Zalkind6-3, 6-2
2021-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEve Weber / Aldona Petraitis vs Elisabeth Barrand / Cheryl Hughes2-6, 2-6
2021-07-13vs Team 2 Sassy SmashersWon 10
W#1 DoublesRenee Wall / Erin Kaplan vs Julie Zalkind / Josephine Cooper6-1, 6-3
2021-07-10vs Team 8 Bubbles and BlingWon 10
W#1 DoublesRenee Wall / Erin Kaplan vs Leigh Wilson / Lorraine Tacinelli6-4, 6-4
2021-06-29vs Team 10 Come Back GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeslie-Anne Levy / Andrea Hallett vs Erin Bannister / Susan Spector7-6, 2-3
W#2 DoublesRenee Wall / Deborah McNicholas vs Andrea Hickman / Marcia Pokrant7-6, 3-2
2021-06-24vs Team 11 NamaslayLost 01
L#1 DoublesCari Votava / Renee Wall vs Nancy Scully / Suzanne Stroup2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Erin Kaplan
published 4
3.78
Leslie-Anne Levy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Eve Weber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Renee Wall
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.29
Colleen Gustavson
published 3.5
3.21
Aldona Petraitis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Lisa Freda
published
3.02
Julie Mandia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Wall + Erin Kaplan314 matchesnot enough data
Renee Wall + Leslie-Anne Levy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin Kaplan
40W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Leslie-Anne Levy
117W–90L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Eve Weber
74W–86L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Renee Wall
232W–249L career · 6 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Colleen Gustavson
1W–13L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Aldona Petraitis
139W–202L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
Lisa Freda
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.05
Julie Mandia
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.