Teams

Team 11 Namaslay

2021 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-07-27vs Team 8 Bubbles and BlingWon 30
W#1 DoublesBlair Reid / Colleen Stoltz vs Heather Viar / Monique Berten6-4, 3-4
W#1 SinglesJenelle Langen vs Leigh Neary6-4, 2-0
W#2 DoublesLeah Noonan / Theresa Mullally vs Mary Hope / Teresa Plott6-1, 6-1
2021-07-24Won 20
W#1 DoublesDora Rodrigues / Blair Reid vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLeah Noonan / Theresa Mullally vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-21vs Team 7 OVER SERVED AGAIN 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesTheresa Mullally / Leah Noonan vs Brendy Hantzes / Margaret Vermillion7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesColleen Stoltz / Blair Reid vs Jacqueline Lawlor / Dawn Word6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-19vs Team 15Won 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Scully / Colleen Stoltz vs Wendy Carvajal / Pamela Ryon6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCheryl Danner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTamara Lindquist / Terry Cocozza vs Elizabeth Marcotte / Cindy Schaller6-1, 6-2
2021-07-18Split 11
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Stroup / Caridad Coto vs Linda Bhangdia / Alice Ling0-6, 6-6
W#2 DoublesCatalina Tafur / Theresa Mullally vs Sherry Haideri / Tamara Lindquist6-2, 6-1
2021-07-13vs Team 10 Come Back GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Connally / Suzanne Stroup vs Jenny Herbek / Tracey White3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJenelle Langen vs Laura Kenney2-1
W#2 DoublesKimberlee Overdeck / Nancy Scully vs Erin Bannister / Andrea Hickman6-4, 5-2
2021-07-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Stroup / Blair Reid vs Loretta Sevier / Jennifer Eveges2-6, 1-6
2021-07-09Split 11
W#1 DoublesCaridad Coto / Suzanne Stroup vs Aileen Jones / Alice Ling5-7, 5-2
L#2 DoublesTheresa Mullally / Heather Viar vs Linda Walsh / Susan Donegan4-6, 5-5
2021-07-08vs Team 2 Sassy SmashersWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeah Noonan / Theresa Mullally vs Julie Zalkind / Sherry Bellamy6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTerry Cocozza vs Erika Hoyt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Danner / Suzanne Stroup vs Susan Douglas / Julie Borror6-2, 6-1
2021-06-29vs Team 13 ShotmakersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJenelle Langen / Colleen Stoltz vs Jessica Clark / Bonnie Lefbom7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTerry Cocozza vs Jennifer Kirkpatrick Zicht7-5, 3-3
L#2 DoublesKimberlee Overdeck / Wendy Stoner vs Cheryl Hughes / Elisabeth Barrand5-7, 1-4
2021-06-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesTheresa Mullally / Catalina Tafur vs Linda Walsh / Eleanor Tydings Gollob6-1, 6-1
2021-06-24vs Team 12 Inoculated ShotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Scully / Suzanne Stroup vs Cari Votava / Renee Wall6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKimberlee Overdeck vs Sheila Laszlo6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Leah Noonan
published
Colleen Stoltz
published 4.5
4.05
Blair Reid
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.93
Nancy Scully
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Kimberlee Overdeck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.72
Suzanne Stroup
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Jenelle Langen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Tamara Lindquist
published
3.42
Terry Cocozza
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Cheryl Danner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Theresa Mullally
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blair Reid + Suzanne Stroup6456% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Danner + Suzanne Stroup5452% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Scully + Suzanne Stroup2450% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Scully + Blair Reid5071% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Danner + Terry Cocozza044 matchesnot enough data
Blair Reid + Leah Noonan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Noonan
50W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Colleen Stoltz
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Blair Reid
157W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
4.05
4
Nancy Scully
151W–50L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Kimberlee Overdeck
81W–132L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Suzanne Stroup
163W–101L career · 6 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Jenelle Langen
243W–115L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
Tamara Lindquist
11W–33L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Terry Cocozza
230W–349L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Cheryl Danner
137W–193L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
0
Theresa Mullally
158W–67L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.