Teams

Songstad/Nashville

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women - Friday AM

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-03vs ThPM-Blevins /Thomas/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Shulman / Erin Simpson vs Cari Blevins / Stacy Thomas6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarie Hope Kirkland / Kelley Durham vs Mollie Alvarez / Michelle Reyzer6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCaroline Browder / Sacha Bone vs Kelly Clapp / Ashley West6-0, 7-6
2025-06-27vs Simpson/Downes/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatti Hudgins / Erin Simpson vs Liza Robinson / Yukari Moriyama6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristy Hermann / Gretchen Dahle vs Stephanie Snap / Melissa Chadwick6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSacha Bone / Joelle Speed vs Jennifer McNabb / Caroline Bryan6-3, 6-4
2025-06-19vs ThPM-Ossman/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Simpson / Jennifer McKenzie vs Palina Beck / Amy Gilmore6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKelley Durham / Felice Oldacre vs Janet Adamson / Cindy Mccullough6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKara Kolstad / Laurie Hooper vs Lily Qu / Stephanie Nelson3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women - Friday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Erin Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Patti Hudgins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Felice Oldacre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Christy Hermann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Holly Ing
published
3.75
Gretchen Dahle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Kelley Durham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Kara Kolstad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Marie Hope Kirkland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Jennifer Ribas
published
3.30
Caroline Browder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Sacha Bone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Laurie Hooper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Lucy Duvall
published
3.19
Joelle Speed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Mary Barton
published
Jennifer McKenzie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ynell Songstad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patti Hudgins + Erin Simpson8255% games−0.9% vs expected
Felice Oldacre + Erin Simpson224 matchesnot enough data
Kara Kolstad + Gretchen Dahle314 matchesnot enough data
Joelle Speed + Sacha Bone404 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Browder + Jennifer Ribas314 matchesnot enough data
Christy Hermann + Gretchen Dahle224 matchesnot enough data
Patti Hudgins + Kelley Durham303 matchesnot enough data
Kara Kolstad + Lucy Duvall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Simpson
30W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Patti Hudgins
26W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Felice Oldacre
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.82
4
Christy Hermann
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Holly Ing
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Gretchen Dahle
22W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Kelley Durham
24W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
Kara Kolstad
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Marie Hope Kirkland
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.43
Jennifer Ribas
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Caroline Browder
25W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Sacha Bone
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Laurie Hooper
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Lucy Duvall
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Joelle Speed
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Mary Barton
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Jennifer McKenzie
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ynell Songstad
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.